Libraries
Simple item page
dc.citation.epage113en_US
dc.citation.spage112en_US
dc.contributor.authorRantanen, M.M.
dc.contributor.authorHines, Robert H.
dc.contributor.authorKim, I.H.
dc.contributor.authorHancock, Joe D.
dc.contributor.authoreidjhancocken_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-03-12T21:25:55Z
dc.date.available2010-03-12T21:25:55Z
dc.date.issued2010-03-12T21:25:55Z
dc.date.published1995en_US
dc.description.abstractPigs fed from wet-dry feeders had 4% greater ADG with 50% less water usage than those consuming feed from dry feeders. Pelleting diets improved F/G by 4% compared to meal diets. However, the benefits of pelleting were primarily when a dry feeder was used, with little evidence to support use of both pelleting and wet/dry feeders for finishing pigs.en_US
dc.description.conferenceSwine Day, Manhattan, KS, November 16, 1995en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2097/3167
dc.publisherKansas State University. Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Serviceen_US
dc.relation.isPartOfSwine day, 1995en_US
dc.relation.isPartOfKansas Agricultural Experiment Station contribution; no. 96-140-Sen_US
dc.relation.isPartOfReport of progress (Kansas State University. Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service); 746en_US
dc.subjectSwineen_US
dc.subjectFinishing pigsen_US
dc.subjectFeedersen_US
dc.subjectPelleten_US
dc.titleEffects of feeder design and pelleting on growth performance and water use in finishing pigsen_US
dc.typeConference paperen_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Swine95pg112-113.pdf
Size:
132.15 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Download

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.69 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:
Download

Collections

Swine Day, 1995
facebook
twitter
youtube

Open Publishing Exchange

K-State Libraries

1117 Mid-Campus Drive North, Manhattan, KS 66506

785-532-3514|ope@k-state.edu