Drylot receiving program vs pasture conditioning with Micotil® metaphylaxis for grazing stocker calves
dc.citation.epage | 67 | en_US |
dc.citation.spage | 65 | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Paisley, S.I. | |
dc.contributor.author | Falkner, Thomas R. | |
dc.contributor.author | Brazle, F.K. | |
dc.contributor.author | Stokka, Gerald L. | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2010-08-23T17:33:33Z | |
dc.date.available | 2010-08-23T17:33:33Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2010-08-23T17:33:33Z | |
dc.date.published | 2000 | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | Three stocker cattle field studies were conducted comparing a traditional 4- to 5-week drylot receiving program with injectable antibiotics administered on a pull-and-treat basis versus a pasture-based conditioning program using an initial metaphylaxis with Micotil® followed by immediately placing cattle on grass. Although daily gains were similar (P=.80) for both receiving programs during the first 28 days, pasture conditioning reduced the number of cattle treated and increased (P<.01) daily gains during the subsequent grazing phase. | en_US |
dc.description.conference | Cattlemen's Day, 2000, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS, March 3, 2000 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/2097/4669 | |
dc.publisher | Kansas State University. Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service | en_US |
dc.relation.isPartOf | Cattlemen’s Day, 2000 | en_US |
dc.relation.isPartOf | Kansas Agricultural Experiment Station contribution; no. 00-287-S | en_US |
dc.relation.isPartOf | Report of progress (Kansas State University. Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service); 850 | en_US |
dc.subject | Beef | en_US |
dc.subject | Stockers | en_US |
dc.subject | Receiving | en_US |
dc.subject | Metaphylaxis | en_US |
dc.subject | Micotil® | en_US |
dc.title | Drylot receiving program vs pasture conditioning with Micotil® metaphylaxis for grazing stocker calves | en_US |
dc.type | Conference paper | en_US |