Assessing differences in perceptions and actual health status: a national cross-sectional analysis

dc.contributor.authorRoss, Kara
dc.date.accessioned2010-11-24T18:56:03Z
dc.date.available2010-11-24T18:56:03Z
dc.date.graduationmonthDecemberen_US
dc.date.issued2010-11-24
dc.date.published2010en_US
dc.description.abstractPublic health policies seek to address health issues that pose significant concerns to public health policymakers. Because these initiatives have economic costs, economic agents’ response to them would be driven by the outcome of their benefit-cost assessment of the policies. Therefore, the congruence between perception and reality of economic agents’ health becomes important in evaluating the potential effectiveness of these initiatives. This research sought to determine the extent of congruence between objective and subjective health status at the individual level. The results would contribute to the framing and implementation of health policies that have higher probability of adoption by economic agents. The National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2005-2006 data were used for this research. The dependent variables defined in the study are subjective health status perception and objective metrics of individuals’ health status proxied by their body mass index (BMI), waist circumference, high density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol level, and fasting blood glucose. The nature of these dependent variables demanded that both categorical dependent variable and ordinary least squares models be employed in the estimation of the models. Chow tests were used to determine the extent of congruence between perception and reality of respondents’ health status. The study did not find any differences between perception and reality based on waist circumference but the same could not be said about BMI. Additionally, there were differences between subjective health perceptions and objective measures of health status based on receiving information about their health status from a health care professional. If it is assumed that the cost of responding to health policies are reduced with higher congruence between subjective and objective health status, then this study’s results suggest that policy must begin with increasing the objective information that people have about their health. While the provision of this information at the individual level could be expensive, it will improve the success rate of health promotion initiatives. The increase in these initiatives’ success should contribute to a reduction in the nation’s health care costs attributable to lifestyle related diseases such as obesity.en_US
dc.description.advisorVincent R. Amanor-Boaduen_US
dc.description.degreeDoctor of Philosophyen_US
dc.description.departmentDepartment of Agricultural Economicsen_US
dc.description.levelDoctoralen_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2097/6652
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherKansas State Universityen
dc.subjectPerceptionen_US
dc.subjectHealth statusen_US
dc.subjectHealth informationen_US
dc.subjectPublic healthen_US
dc.subject.umiHealth Sciences, Public Health (0573)en_US
dc.titleAssessing differences in perceptions and actual health status: a national cross-sectional analysisen_US
dc.typeDissertationen_US

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
KaraRoss2010.pdf
Size:
1.6 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.61 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: