Penalized or Privileged? Sexual Identity, Gender, and Postsecondary Educational Attainment
dc.citation.doi | 10.1086/679393 | |
dc.citation.epage | 297 | |
dc.citation.issn | 0195-6744 | |
dc.citation.issue | 2 | |
dc.citation.jtitle | American Journal of Education | |
dc.citation.spage | 271 | |
dc.citation.volume | 121 | |
dc.contributor.author | Fine, Leigh E. | |
dc.contributor.authoreid | fine | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2016-04-06T15:24:54Z | |
dc.date.available | 2016-04-06T15:24:54Z | |
dc.date.published | 2015 | |
dc.description | Citation: Fine, L. E. (2015). Penalized or Privileged? Sexual Identity, Gender, and Postsecondary Educational Attainment. American Journal of Education, 121(2), 271-297. doi:10.1086/679393 | |
dc.description | Prior literature on educational attainment indicates that there is both a female advantage and an LGB bonus: women are more likely to have earned bachelor's degrees than men, and lesbian, gay, and bisexual (LGB) persons are more likely to have earned a bachelor's degree than heterosexuals. Using data from the National Longitudinal Survey of Adolescent Health, I run logistic regressions on respondents' likelihood of having a bachelor's degree as a function of both gender and sexuality. I find that the female advantage and LGB bonus do not hold for sexual minority women, who are the gender and sexuality group least likely to have completed college. | |
dc.description.embargo | Embargo 12/19/2016 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/2097/32480 | |
dc.relation.uri | https://doi.org/10.1086/679393 | |
dc.rights | © 2015 by The University of Chicago | |
dc.rights.uri | http://www.sherpa.ac.uk/romeo/issn/0195-6744/ | |
dc.subject | College Completion | |
dc.subject | United-States | |
dc.subject | Gay | |
dc.subject | Adolescents | |
dc.subject | Population | |
dc.subject | Impact | |
dc.title | Penalized or Privileged? Sexual Identity, Gender, and Postsecondary Educational Attainment | |
dc.type | Article |
Files
Original bundle
1 - 1 of 1