Penalized or Privileged? Sexual Identity, Gender, and Postsecondary Educational Attainment

dc.citation.doi10.1086/679393
dc.citation.epage297
dc.citation.issn0195-6744
dc.citation.issue2
dc.citation.jtitleAmerican Journal of Education
dc.citation.spage271
dc.citation.volume121
dc.contributor.authorFine, Leigh E.
dc.contributor.authoreidfine
dc.date.accessioned2016-04-06T15:24:54Z
dc.date.available2016-04-06T15:24:54Z
dc.date.published2015
dc.descriptionCitation: Fine, L. E. (2015). Penalized or Privileged? Sexual Identity, Gender, and Postsecondary Educational Attainment. American Journal of Education, 121(2), 271-297. doi:10.1086/679393
dc.descriptionPrior literature on educational attainment indicates that there is both a female advantage and an LGB bonus: women are more likely to have earned bachelor's degrees than men, and lesbian, gay, and bisexual (LGB) persons are more likely to have earned a bachelor's degree than heterosexuals. Using data from the National Longitudinal Survey of Adolescent Health, I run logistic regressions on respondents' likelihood of having a bachelor's degree as a function of both gender and sexuality. I find that the female advantage and LGB bonus do not hold for sexual minority women, who are the gender and sexuality group least likely to have completed college.
dc.description.embargoEmbargo 12/19/2016
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2097/32480
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.1086/679393
dc.rights© 2015 by The University of Chicago
dc.rights.urihttp://www.sherpa.ac.uk/romeo/issn/0195-6744/
dc.subjectCollege Completion
dc.subjectUnited-States
dc.subjectGay
dc.subjectAdolescents
dc.subjectPopulation
dc.subjectImpact
dc.titlePenalized or Privileged? Sexual Identity, Gender, and Postsecondary Educational Attainment
dc.typeArticle

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
679393.pdf
Size:
254.68 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description: