A comparison of flea control measurement methods for tracking flea populations in highly infested private residences in Tampa FL, following topical treatment of pets with FRONTLINE® Plus (Fipronil/(S)-Methoprene)

dc.citation.epage367en_US
dc.citation.issue4en_US
dc.citation.jtitleInternational Journal of Applied Research in Veterinary Medicineen_US
dc.citation.spage356en_US
dc.citation.volume9en_US
dc.contributor.authorDryden, Michael W.
dc.contributor.authorCarithers, Doug
dc.contributor.authorMcBride, Amy
dc.contributor.authorRiggs, Breanne
dc.contributor.authorSmith, Lindsey
dc.contributor.authorDavenport, Jacob
dc.contributor.authorSmith, Victorene E.
dc.contributor.authorPayne, Patricia
dc.contributor.authorGross, Sheila J.
dc.contributor.authoreiddrydenen_US
dc.contributor.authoreiddrpayneen_US
dc.date.accessioned2012-10-03T14:53:37Z
dc.date.available2012-10-03T14:53:37Z
dc.date.issued2012-10-03
dc.date.published2011en_US
dc.description.abstractThe efficacy of fibronil/(S)-methoprene (FRONTLINE® Plus, Merial Limited, Duluth GA, USA) for household flea control was assessed against existing natural flea populations in homes in Tampa, Florida. Twenty-seven households fulfilled requirements for inclusion into and completed this non-randomized, multiple site (household), prospective field study. The study duration was 60 days, with all household dogs and cats treated with FRONTLINE® Plus on day 0 and day 28-30. Three separate household flea-control assessment methods were used in this study, and each was evaluated to determine its ability to effectively gauge household flea control of natural flea populations in homes. The three methods of assessing household flea control were: 1) Counting fleas captured in intermittent-light environmental flea emergence traps placed in heavily infested areas of the house. 2) Examination of the sex ratios of the fleas captured in the intermittent-light environmental flea emergence traps, and 3) assessing pet flea burdens, as has been typically done historically. Our findings in this study demonstrated that in field situations, the most accurate measure of household flea control trends is determined by comparing counts, over time, of newly emerged (unfed) fleas caught in intermittent-light environmental flea emergence traps. This study also verified that determining sex ratios of the newly emerged trapped fleas provides the best indication of the immediate population trend in flea-infested households. In household studies such as this, when household pets have access to the outdoor environment, this study clearly demonstrated that on-animal flea counts can be inconsistent and provides the least reliable indicator available for measuring suppression of household flea infestations. These findings demonstrated that in field situations FRONTLINE® Plus provided effective flea control, as assessed by the significant decline in flea emergence from the contaminated household.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2097/14772
dc.relation.urihttp://www.jarvm.com/articles/Vol9Iss4/Carithers2.pdfen_US
dc.rightsPermission to archive granted by the International Journal of Applied Research in Veterinary Medicine, September 8. 2012.en_US
dc.subjectCtenocephalides felisen_US
dc.subjectFleasen_US
dc.subjectEmergent fleasen_US
dc.subjectFlea sex ratioen_US
dc.subjectDogen_US
dc.subjectCaten_US
dc.subjectHousehold studyen_US
dc.subjectFlea trap countsen_US
dc.subjectOn-animal flea countsen_US
dc.titleA comparison of flea control measurement methods for tracking flea populations in highly infested private residences in Tampa FL, following topical treatment of pets with FRONTLINE® Plus (Fipronil/(S)-Methoprene)en_US
dc.typeArticle (publisher version)en_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Comparison of flea - publisher's PDF.pdf
Size:
393.25 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.62 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: