Effects of wind energy development on survival of female greater prairie-chickens

dc.citation.doidoi:10.1111/1365-2664.12184en_US
dc.citation.epage405en_US
dc.citation.issue2en_US
dc.citation.jtitleJournal of Applied Ecologyen_US
dc.citation.spage395en_US
dc.citation.volume51en_US
dc.contributor.authorWinder, Virginia L.
dc.contributor.authorMcNew, Lance B.
dc.contributor.authorGregory, Andrew J.
dc.contributor.authorHunt, Lyla M.
dc.contributor.authorWisely, Samantha M.
dc.contributor.authorSandercock, Brett K.
dc.contributor.authoreidbsandercen_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-05-09T14:33:57Z
dc.date.available2014-05-09T14:33:57Z
dc.date.issued2014-05-09
dc.date.published2014en_US
dc.description.abstractThe potential effects of wind energy development on wildlife have received increased attention over the past decade. In Kansas, optimal sites for wind energy development often overlap with preferred habitats of greater prairie-chickens Tympanuchus cupido. Our goal was to determine whether wind energy development affected survival of female prairie-chickens in a grassland ecosystem, assessing one potential impact of wind on an upland gamebird of conservation concern. We focused primarily on the response of female prairie-chickens to wind energy development because population dynamics of prairie-chickens are primarily determined by female demography. We monitored prairie-chickens at a wind facility in Kansas during a 2-year pre-construction (2007–2008) and a 3-year post-construction period (2009–2011). We used data from 220 radio-marked females to calculate weekly survival and hazard rates. We used cause of death for 81 mortality events to test for changes in the proportion of mortalities attributed to mammalian predators, avian predators and collisions. We observed an unexpected increase in annual survival during the post-construction period (0·57) compared with the pre-construction period (0·32). Distance from home range centroid to the nearest wind turbine site had no effect on weekly survival of females. Collision mortality events were rare, and most were associated with fences or transmission lines and not turbine blades. Most female mortality was due to predation (c. 90%). Differences in annual survival were driven by a higher risk of mortality during lekking activity in March and April during the pre-construction period (weekly hazard rate = 0·050–0·062) compared with the post-construction period (hazard rate = 0·012–0·021). We observed no change in the proportion of mortalities attributed to different causes between the two treatment periods. Synthesis and applications. Development of a wind energy facility had no negative effect on survival of female prairie-chickens. The results of our field study indicate that greater prairie-chickens are less sensitive to wind energy development than lesser prairie-chickens Tympanuchus pallidicinctus and greater sage-grouse Centrocercus urophasianus are to oil and gas development. We have strong evidence that survival increased after wind energy development, and hypothesize that energy development affected the local predator community, resulting in an indirect effect of decreased predation risk during the post-construction period.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2097/17725
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.relation.urihttp://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1365-2664.12184/fullen_US
dc.rights© 2013 The Authors. Journal of Applied Ecology © 2013 British Ecological Society. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non-commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.en_US
dc.subjectCollisionsen_US
dc.subjectGrassland bird communityen_US
dc.subjectGrouseen_US
dc.subjectHazard functionen_US
dc.subjectMortalityen_US
dc.subjectWind turbineen_US
dc.titleEffects of wind energy development on survival of female greater prairie-chickensen_US
dc.typeArticle (publisher version)en_US

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
SandercockJAppEco2014.pdf
Size:
516.55 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.62 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: