The toxicity of liquid supplements containing urea

dc.citation.epage4en_US
dc.citation.spage1en_US
dc.contributor.authorBartley, E.E.
dc.date.accessioned2011-01-27T20:51:53Z
dc.date.available2011-01-27T20:51:53Z
dc.date.issued2011-01-27
dc.date.published1981en_US
dc.description.abstractLiquid supplement manufacturers must provide a product that is effectively utilized and is nontoxic. Toxicity can be reduced if the supplement's pH is below 3.8, but low pH alone does not improve nutritive value. A good fermentable source of carbohydrate, like molasses or cooked starch, should be provided in adequate amount. When water or lignin sulfonates are substituted for good carbohydrate, urea utilization is reduced and the risk of toxicity is increased. Cattle that are hungry or starved from blizzard conditions or feed restriction are much more susceptible to ammonia toxicity than cattle kept full, so limit the availability of liquid supplements to hungry cattle. Urea is safer if cattle are adapted to it. Always start cattle on urea-containing feeds slowly and keep them full of other feed.en_US
dc.description.conferenceCattlemen's Day, 1981, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS, March 6, 1981en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2097/7130
dc.publisherKansas State University. Agricultural Experiment Stationen_US
dc.relation.isPartOfCattlemen’s Day, 1981en_US
dc.relation.isPartOfReport of progress (Kansas State University. Agricultural Experiment Station); 394en_US
dc.subjectBeefen_US
dc.subjectToxicityen_US
dc.subjectUreaen_US
dc.subjectLiquid supplementsen_US
dc.titleThe toxicity of liquid supplements containing ureaen_US
dc.typeConference paperen_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
cattle81pg1-4.pdf
Size:
267.5 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.61 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: