Laboratory evaluation of attract-and-kill formulations against the Indianmeal moth, Plodia interpunctella (Hübner) (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae)

dc.citationCampos, M., & Phillips, T. W. (2013). Laboratory evaluation of attract-and-kill formulations against the Indianmeal moth, Plodia interpunctella (Hübner) (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae). Retrieved from http://krex.ksu.edu
dc.citation.doi10.1016/j.jspr.2012.09.005en_US
dc.citation.epage20en_US
dc.citation.issn0022-474X
dc.citation.jtitleJournal of Stored Products Researchen_US
dc.citation.spage12en_US
dc.citation.volume52en_US
dc.contributor.authorCampos, Manuel
dc.contributor.authorPhillips, Thomas W.
dc.contributor.authoreidtwp1en_US
dc.date.accessioned2013-04-18T15:59:42Z
dc.date.available2013-04-18T15:59:42Z
dc.date.issued2013-04-18
dc.date.published2013en_US
dc.descriptionCitation: Campos, M., & Phillips, T. W. (2013). Laboratory evaluation of attract-and-kill formulations against the Indianmeal moth, Plodia interpunctella (Hübner) (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae). Retrieved from http://krex.ksu.edu
dc.description.abstractPheromone-based population suppression methods for stored-product insects can reduce or eliminate application of chemical insecticides near finished food products. The responses of adult male Indianmeal moth males (IMM), Plodia interpunctella (Hübner), to the attract-and-kill formulations of a gel, a flat wax panel, and a plastic cylinder device, mixed or sprayed with the pyrethroid insecticides permethrin, cyfluthrin, or organically compliant natural pyrethrin, combined with the synthetic female sex pheromone (Z,E) -9,12 tetradecadienyl acetate, were evaluated in a laboratory wind tunnel. The wax panel and cylinder, which utilized controlled-release pheromone lures, were more attractive to IMM males over the course of an eight-week aging period than was the gel, which had the pheromone incorporated into the gel matrix. The contact time for responding males was longer on the wax panel and plastic cylinder than on the gel formulation. The percentage of mortality of males was higher with wax panels formulated with cyfluthrin at 6.0% AI, permethrin at 6.0% AI and the cylinder formulated with cyfluthrin at 2.0% AI, compared to the gel over the eight-week study. These same formulations had the greatest impact on egg-laying by females paired with treated males and on the percent of eggs that hatched. Of all the attract-and-kill formulations tested, the most promising for field applications to suppress IMM pest populations was the wax panel containing 6.0% AI of either cyfluthrin or permethrin.en_US
dc.description.versionArticle: Accepted Manuscript
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2097/15524
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jspr.2012.09.005en_US
dc.rightsCopyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
dc.rights.urihttps://www.elsevier.com/about/policies/sharing
dc.subjectWind tunnelen_US
dc.subjectAttracticideen_US
dc.subjectPheromoneen_US
dc.subjectStored-productsen_US
dc.subjectResidual insecticidesen_US
dc.titleLaboratory evaluation of attract-and-kill formulations against the Indianmeal moth, Plodia interpunctella (Hübner) (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae)en_US
dc.typeTexten_US

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
PhillipsJofStoredProdRes2013.pdf
Size:
173.48 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.62 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: