A comparison of different particle size analysis techniques
dc.citation.epage | 141 | en_US |
dc.citation.spage | 138 | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Baldridge, A.L. | |
dc.contributor.author | Stainbrook, T.L. | |
dc.contributor.author | Woodworth, J.C. | |
dc.contributor.author | Tokach, Michael D. | |
dc.contributor.author | Nelssen, Jim L. | |
dc.contributor.author | Goodband, Robert D. | |
dc.contributor.authoreid | mtokach | en_US |
dc.contributor.authoreid | jnelssen | en_US |
dc.contributor.authoreid | goodband | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2010-02-18T20:18:15Z | |
dc.date.available | 2010-02-18T20:18:15Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2010-02-18T20:18:15Z | |
dc.date.published | 2001 | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | In this study, we compared different methods of testing particle size of ground corn. Forty-four corn samples were analyzed for particle size with a Ro-Tap tester equipped with a 13-sieve stack (53 to 3,350 :m tyler mesh screens). Mean particle size of the 44 samples ranged from 422 to 1,143 :m. These samples were then analyzed by placing 280 g on a #14 sieve (1,400 :m). The sieve was shaken by hand as the manufacturer recommended (one-sieve method). In a second procedure, samples were analyzed by placing 50 g of corn on a stack of three sieves: US #12 (1700 :m), #30 (600 :m), and #50 (300 :m: three-sieve method) with balls and carnucles. The three-sieve method was much more reliable in predicting average particle size of ground corn than the one-sieve method when compared to the 13- stack standard operating procedure. In summary, the three-sieve procedure may be a more accurate method to quickly determine particle size than the one-sieve method. | en_US |
dc.description.conference | Swine Day, Manhattan, KS, November 15, 2001 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/2097/2617 | |
dc.publisher | Kansas State University. Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service | en_US |
dc.relation.isPartOf | Swine day, 2001 | en_US |
dc.relation.isPartOf | Kansas Agricultural Experiment Station contribution; no. 02-132-S | en_US |
dc.relation.isPartOf | Report of progress (Kansas State University. Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service); 880 | en_US |
dc.subject | Swine | en_US |
dc.subject | Ground corn | en_US |
dc.subject | Particle size | en_US |
dc.subject | Procedures | en_US |
dc.title | A comparison of different particle size analysis techniques | en_US |
dc.type | Conference paper | en_US |