Purification Of Minute Virus Of Mice Using High Performance Tangential Flow Filtration

dc.citation.doi10.1016/j.desal.2009.09.122en_US
dc.citation.epage1124en_US
dc.citation.issue3en_US
dc.citation.jtitleDesalinationen_US
dc.citation.spage1121en_US
dc.citation.volume250en_US
dc.contributor.authorHensgen, Miriam I.
dc.contributor.authorCzermak, Peter
dc.contributor.authorCarlson, Jonathan O.
dc.contributor.authorWickramasinghe, S. Ranil
dc.contributor.authoreidpczermaken_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-04-08T15:40:23Z
dc.date.available2010-04-08T15:40:23Z
dc.date.issued2010-01-01
dc.date.published2010en_US
dc.description.abstractMembrane technology has proven to be a mainstay separation technology over the past two decades. Some major advantages of membrane technology are application without the addition of chemicals and a comparatively low energy use. With its current applications, membrane technology has been widely used in biotechnology processes. Cell harvesting and virus purification/removal are important processes in many downstream purifications of biopharmaceutical products. For this project, ultrafiltration (UF) for virus purification from cell culture broth was used. Recently, it has been demonstrated that UF is a powerful tool for purification of other viruses such as Aedes aegypti and virus-like particles. More precisely, high-performance tangential flow filtration (HPTFF) will be used, which was first introduced by Robert van Reis in 1997. To date HPTFF has been used in other projects, as for protein concentration, purification, and buffer exchange as a single unit operation. The virus used in this study was the parvovirus Minute Virus of Mice (MVM); characterized by an average diameter of 22-26 nm and icosahedral symmetry. Experiments were conducted with 300, 100 and 50 kDa Sartorius membranes. Results obtained indicate that using the 50 or 100 kDa membrane, viral particles get excluded, whereas the 300 kDa membrane allows the passage of the virus particles into the permeate. In HPTFF mode the permeate flux decline of the 300 kDa ultrafiltration membrane is much greater than for the other membranes used. One possible explanation for this decay could have to do with the virus particles’ access to the membrane pores (gradual pore narrowing). Additionally the permeate flux and level of protein rejection as well, are strongly affected by the cell culture medium.en_US
dc.description.versionArticle (author version)
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2097/3522
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2009.09.122en_US
dc.rightsThis Item is protected by copyright and/or related rights. You are free to use this Item in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you need to obtain permission from the rights-holder(s).
dc.rights.urihttps://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/
dc.subjectVirus recoveryen_US
dc.subjectHigh performance tangential flow filtrationen_US
dc.subjectUltrafiltrationen_US
dc.subjectMinute Virus of Miceen_US
dc.subjectDownstream purificationen_US
dc.subjectFiltration processen_US
dc.titlePurification Of Minute Virus Of Mice Using High Performance Tangential Flow Filtrationen_US
dc.typeTexten_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
HensgenDesalination2010.pdf
Size:
180.36 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.69 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: