Comparison of oral iron and injectable iron for the prevention of iron deficiency anemia in baby pigs

dc.citation.epage87en_US
dc.citation.spage86en_US
dc.contributor.authorBeeman, K.B.
dc.contributor.authorSchoneweis, D.A.
dc.date.accessioned2010-02-11T22:33:50Z
dc.date.available2010-02-11T22:33:50Z
dc.date.issued2010-02-11T22:33:50Z
dc.date.published1992en_US
dc.description.abstractOne of two oral iron compounds or an injectable iron (100 mg iron per treatment) were administered to pigs on d 1 and 15 postfarrowing, and they were compared with untreated littermates. There was no significant difference between the pigs receiving the oral iron and the negative controls in serum iron or total iron binding capacity. Pigs that received iron by injection had higher serum iron and packed cell volume and a lower total iron binding capacity compared with pigs given oral iron or untreated controls.en_US
dc.description.conferenceSwine Day, Manhattan, KS, November 19, 1992en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2097/2542
dc.publisherKansas State University. Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Serviceen_US
dc.relation.isPartOfSwine day, 1992en_US
dc.relation.isPartOfKansas Agricultural Experiment Station contribution; no. 93-142-Sen_US
dc.relation.isPartOfReport of progress (Kansas State University. Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service); 667en_US
dc.subjectSwineen_US
dc.subjectPigleten_US
dc.subjectIronen_US
dc.subjectAnemiaen_US
dc.titleComparison of oral iron and injectable iron for the prevention of iron deficiency anemia in baby pigsen_US
dc.typeConference paperen_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Swine92pg86-87.pdf
Size:
198.62 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.69 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:

Collections