| dc.citation.epage | 177 | en_US |
| dc.citation.spage | 172 | en_US |
| dc.contributor.author | Myers, A.J. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Bergstrom, J.R. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Goodband, Robert D. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Tokach, Michael D. | |
| dc.contributor.author | DeRouchey, Joel M. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Nelssen, Jim L. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Dritz, Steven S. | |
| dc.contributor.authoreid | goodband | en_US |
| dc.contributor.authoreid | mtokach | en_US |
| dc.contributor.authoreid | dritz | en_US |
| dc.contributor.authoreid | jderouch | en_US |
| dc.contributor.authoreid | jnelssen | en_US |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2010-11-22T17:51:25Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2010-11-22T17:51:25Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2010-11-22 | |
| dc.date.published | 2010 | en_US |
| dc.description.abstract | A total of 288 pigs (PIC TR4 × 1050, initially 82 lb) were used in a 91-d study to evaluate the effects of feeder trough space (1.75 vs. 3.5 in/pig) and minimum feeder-gap opening of 0.5 in. (narrow), vs. 1.0 in. (wide) on finisher pig performance. Our hypothesis was that at minimal feeder trough space (1.75 in./pig), feeders should be set at a wide gap opening to avoid limiting feed intake and ADG. The feeders were adjusted to the minimum gap setting, but the agitation plate could be moved upward to a maximum gap opening of 0.75 in. or 1.25 in., respectively. The treatments were arranged in a 2 × 2 factorial with 6 replications per treatment. All pens had the same feeder with 2, 14-in.-wide by 4.5-in.-deep feeder holes. Feeder trough space was adjusted by placing 8 or 16 pigs per pen. Gating was adjusted to give each pig 8 ft2 of floor space. Pigs had ad libitum access to feed and water. All pigs were fed a corn-soybean meal-based diet containing 20% dried distillers grains with solubles (DDGS) in 4 phases. Pen weights and feed disappearance were measured every 2 wk. Narrow-adjusted feeders averaged approximately 48% coverage, and wide-adjusted feeders averaged approximately 85% coverage. Overall (d 0 to 91) there were no trough space × feeder adjustment interactions observed (P > 0.10). However, there was a tendency (P = 0.08) for increased ADG as feeder trough space increased from 1.75 to 3.5 in./pig. Pigs fed with the wide feeder-gap setting had increased (P < 0.01) feed disappearance and poorer (P < 0.01) F/G compared to pigs with the narrow feeder-gap setting. These results suggest that, regardless of feeder trough space, pigs with the wide feeder adjustment appeared to waste more feed, as evidenced by the poorer F/G. | en_US |
| dc.description.conference | Swine Day, Manhattan, KS, November 18, 2010 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/2097/6577 | |
| dc.publisher | Kansas State University. Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service | en_US |
| dc.relation.isPartOf | Swine Day, 2010 | en_US |
| dc.relation.isPartOf | Kansas Agricultural Experiment Station contribution; no. 11-016-S | en_US |
| dc.relation.isPartOf | Report of progress (Kansas State University. Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service); 1038 | en_US |
| dc.subject | Swine | en_US |
| dc.subject | Feeder adjustment | en_US |
| dc.subject | Finishing pig | en_US |
| dc.subject | Trough space | en_US |
| dc.title | The effects of feeder space and adjustment on growth performance of finishing pigs | en_US |
| dc.type | Conference paper | en_US |
English
العربية
বাংলা
Català
Čeština
Deutsch
Ελληνικά
Español
فارسی
Suomi
Français
Gàidhlig
ગુજરાતી
हिंदी
Magyar
Italiano
Қазақ
Latviešu
मराठी
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Português do Brasil
Русский
Srpski (lat)
Српски
Svenska
தமிழ்
Türkçe
Yкраї́нська
Tiếng Việt
繁体中文