The effects of feeder space and adjustment on growth performance of finishing pigs
dc.citation.epage | 177 | en_US |
dc.citation.spage | 172 | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Myers, A.J. | |
dc.contributor.author | Bergstrom, J.R. | |
dc.contributor.author | Goodband, Robert D. | |
dc.contributor.author | Tokach, Michael D. | |
dc.contributor.author | DeRouchey, Joel M. | |
dc.contributor.author | Nelssen, Jim L. | |
dc.contributor.author | Dritz, Steven S. | |
dc.contributor.authoreid | goodband | en_US |
dc.contributor.authoreid | mtokach | en_US |
dc.contributor.authoreid | dritz | en_US |
dc.contributor.authoreid | jderouch | en_US |
dc.contributor.authoreid | jnelssen | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2010-11-22T17:51:25Z | |
dc.date.available | 2010-11-22T17:51:25Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2010-11-22 | |
dc.date.published | 2010 | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | A total of 288 pigs (PIC TR4 × 1050, initially 82 lb) were used in a 91-d study to evaluate the effects of feeder trough space (1.75 vs. 3.5 in/pig) and minimum feeder-gap opening of 0.5 in. (narrow), vs. 1.0 in. (wide) on finisher pig performance. Our hypothesis was that at minimal feeder trough space (1.75 in./pig), feeders should be set at a wide gap opening to avoid limiting feed intake and ADG. The feeders were adjusted to the minimum gap setting, but the agitation plate could be moved upward to a maximum gap opening of 0.75 in. or 1.25 in., respectively. The treatments were arranged in a 2 × 2 factorial with 6 replications per treatment. All pens had the same feeder with 2, 14-in.-wide by 4.5-in.-deep feeder holes. Feeder trough space was adjusted by placing 8 or 16 pigs per pen. Gating was adjusted to give each pig 8 ft2 of floor space. Pigs had ad libitum access to feed and water. All pigs were fed a corn-soybean meal-based diet containing 20% dried distillers grains with solubles (DDGS) in 4 phases. Pen weights and feed disappearance were measured every 2 wk. Narrow-adjusted feeders averaged approximately 48% coverage, and wide-adjusted feeders averaged approximately 85% coverage. Overall (d 0 to 91) there were no trough space × feeder adjustment interactions observed (P > 0.10). However, there was a tendency (P = 0.08) for increased ADG as feeder trough space increased from 1.75 to 3.5 in./pig. Pigs fed with the wide feeder-gap setting had increased (P < 0.01) feed disappearance and poorer (P < 0.01) F/G compared to pigs with the narrow feeder-gap setting. These results suggest that, regardless of feeder trough space, pigs with the wide feeder adjustment appeared to waste more feed, as evidenced by the poorer F/G. | en_US |
dc.description.conference | Swine Day, Manhattan, KS, November 18, 2010 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/2097/6577 | |
dc.publisher | Kansas State University. Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service | en_US |
dc.relation.isPartOf | Swine Day, 2010 | en_US |
dc.relation.isPartOf | Kansas Agricultural Experiment Station contribution; no. 11-016-S | en_US |
dc.relation.isPartOf | Report of progress (Kansas State University. Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service); 1038 | en_US |
dc.subject | Swine | en_US |
dc.subject | Feeder adjustment | en_US |
dc.subject | Finishing pig | en_US |
dc.subject | Trough space | en_US |
dc.title | The effects of feeder space and adjustment on growth performance of finishing pigs | en_US |
dc.type | Conference paper | en_US |