Relative value of ruminally degradable and undegradable protein on the utilization of low-quality prairie hay by steers

dc.citation.epage151en_US
dc.citation.spage147en_US
dc.contributor.authorWickersham, T.A.
dc.contributor.authorCochran, R.C.
dc.contributor.authorFarmer, C.G.
dc.contributor.authorKlevesahl, E.A.
dc.contributor.authorArroquy, J.I.
dc.contributor.authorJohnson, D.E.
dc.contributor.authorGnad, D.P.
dc.contributor.authorTitgemeyer, Evan C.
dc.contributor.authoreidetitgemeen_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-08-04T17:38:29Z
dc.date.available2010-08-04T17:38:29Z
dc.date.issued2010-08-04T17:38:29Z
dc.date.published2003en_US
dc.description.abstractAn experiment was performed to investigate the impact of providing six levels of ruminally degradable protein (RDP; protein that is available to ruminal microbes) in combination with two levels of ruminally undegradable protein (RUP; protein that is not available to the ruminal microbes, but can be digested directly by cattle) on the intake and digestion of low-quality prairie hay. Twelve steers were provided unlimited access to low-quality prairie hay (5.3% crude protein and 71.7% neutral detergent fiber) throughout the trial. To simulate dietary RUP, casein was infused abomasally once daily at either 0 or 0.087% of body weight. To simulate dietary RDP, casein was infused ruminally once daily at 0, 0.029, 0.058, 0.087, 0.116, or 0.145% of body weight. As provision of RDP increased, forage intake and fiber digestion increased. Supplementing with RUP alone increased forage intake but not fiber digestion, although the intake response was not as large as providing the same amount of RDP. In conclusion, RUP is less efficient than RDP in stimulating forage intake and digestion.en_US
dc.description.conferenceCattlemen's Day, 2003, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS, March 7, 2003en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2097/4471
dc.publisherKansas State University. Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Serviceen_US
dc.relation.isPartOfCattlemen's Day, 2003en_US
dc.relation.isPartOfKansas Agricultural Experiment Station contribution; no. 03-272-Sen_US
dc.relation.isPartOfReport of progress (Kansas State University. Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service); 908en_US
dc.subjectBeefen_US
dc.subjectRumenen_US
dc.subjectUndegradable proteinen_US
dc.subjectLow-quality prairie hayen_US
dc.subjectSteersen_US
dc.titleRelative value of ruminally degradable and undegradable protein on the utilization of low-quality prairie hay by steersen_US
dc.typeConference paperen_US

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
cattle03pg147-151.pdf
Size:
154.16 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.69 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: