| dc.citation.epage | 16 | en_US |
| dc.citation.spage | 15 | en_US |
| dc.contributor.author | Corah, L.R. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Beal, W.E. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Spire, M.F. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Stevenson, Jeffrey S. | |
| dc.contributor.authoreid | jss | en_US |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2010-11-02T21:43:12Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2010-11-02T21:43:12Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2010-11-02 | |
| dc.date.published | 1989 | en_US |
| dc.description.abstract | Injecting a GnRH-analog at the time of estrus or at insemination did not generally improve conception rates in heifers inseminated following a synchronized estrus. However, within some herds. a significant positive response was noted. | en_US |
| dc.description.conference | Cattlemen's Day, 1989, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS, March, 1989 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/2097/6462 | |
| dc.publisher | Kansas State University. Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service | en_US |
| dc.relation.isPartOf | Cattlemen’s Day, 1989 | en_US |
| dc.relation.isPartOf | Kansas Agricultural Experiment Station contribution; no. 89-567-S | en_US |
| dc.relation.isPartOf | Report of progress (Kansas State University. Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service); 567 | en_US |
| dc.subject | Beef | en_US |
| dc.subject | Conception rates | en_US |
| dc.subject | GnRH | en_US |
| dc.subject | Estrus | en_US |
| dc.subject | Artificial insemination | en_US |
| dc.title | Conception rates of beef heifers treated with GnRH analog at the time of estrus or at the time of artificial insemination. | en_US |
| dc.type | Conference paper | en_US |
English
العربية
বাংলা
Català
Čeština
Deutsch
Ελληνικά
Español
فارسی
Suomi
Français
Gàidhlig
ગુજરાતી
हिंदी
Magyar
Italiano
Қазақ
Latviešu
मराठी
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Português do Brasil
Русский
Srpski (lat)
Српски
Svenska
தமிழ்
Türkçe
Yкраї́нська
Tiếng Việt
繁体中文