Conception rates of beef heifers treated with GnRH analog at the time of estrus or at the time of artificial insemination.
dc.citation.epage | 16 | en_US |
dc.citation.spage | 15 | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Corah, L.R. | |
dc.contributor.author | Beal, W.E. | |
dc.contributor.author | Spire, M.F. | |
dc.contributor.author | Stevenson, Jeffrey S. | |
dc.contributor.authoreid | jss | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2010-11-02T21:43:12Z | |
dc.date.available | 2010-11-02T21:43:12Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2010-11-02 | |
dc.date.published | 1989 | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | Injecting a GnRH-analog at the time of estrus or at insemination did not generally improve conception rates in heifers inseminated following a synchronized estrus. However, within some herds. a significant positive response was noted. | en_US |
dc.description.conference | Cattlemen's Day, 1989, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS, March, 1989 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/2097/6462 | |
dc.publisher | Kansas State University. Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service | en_US |
dc.relation.isPartOf | Cattlemen’s Day, 1989 | en_US |
dc.relation.isPartOf | Kansas Agricultural Experiment Station contribution; no. 89-567-S | en_US |
dc.relation.isPartOf | Report of progress (Kansas State University. Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service); 567 | en_US |
dc.subject | Beef | en_US |
dc.subject | Conception rates | en_US |
dc.subject | GnRH | en_US |
dc.subject | Estrus | en_US |
dc.subject | Artificial insemination | en_US |
dc.title | Conception rates of beef heifers treated with GnRH analog at the time of estrus or at the time of artificial insemination. | en_US |
dc.type | Conference paper | en_US |