Teacher candidate perceptions of electronic academic portfolios

dc.contributor.authorSamuels, Julie E.
dc.date.accessioned2006-11-13T21:36:59Z
dc.date.available2006-11-13T21:36:59Z
dc.date.graduationmonthDecember
dc.date.issued2006-11-13T21:36:59Z
dc.date.published2006
dc.description.abstractThe purpose of this study was to determine to what extent teacher candidates perceive value in the process of constructing an electronic academic portfolio. This study will also attempt to answer what process teacher candidates used in developing their electronic academic portfolios and what value teacher candidates assign to each of the steps in the process as well as how the teacher candidate intends to use the academic portfolio during the final semester prior to the professional semester. A qualitative multi-case study was used to conduct the research. Data collected included a pre and post survey as well as three one-on-one interviews with eleven teacher candidates. Teacher candidates were also asked to keep an electronic journal to answer the following questions. 1. Describe the process you used to create your electronic academic portfolio. 2. Describe your personal frustrations with creating your electronic academic portfolio. 3. Describe your personal triumphs with creating your electronic academic portfolio. The analysis of the data took place throughout the final semester prior to the professional semester, during which time teacher candidates are taking his or her last five restricted methods courses. The researcher recruited one additional reader in the field of education. The reader was trained prior to the actual coding day by the researcher to identify themes from the pilot study. • Theme A: Pride • Theme B: Organization • Theme C: Technology Skills • Theme D: Value • Other The commonalities were coded by the reader and the researcher. The goal of this was to examine teacher candidate perceptions in creating and electronic academic portfolio. Teacher preparation programs must determine if the process of creating an electronic academic portfolio has positive effectiveness.
dc.description.advisorF. Todd Goodson
dc.description.degreeDoctor of Philosophy
dc.description.departmentCurriculum and Instruction Programs
dc.description.levelDoctoral
dc.format.extent1726396 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/PDF
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2097/211
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherKansas State University
dc.rights© the author. This Item is protected by copyright and/or related rights. You are free to use this Item in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you need to obtain permission from the rights-holder(s).
dc.rights.urihttp://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/
dc.subjectElectronic academic portfolios
dc.subjectTeacher preperation
dc.subject.umiEducation, Curriculum and Instruction (0727)
dc.titleTeacher candidate perceptions of electronic academic portfolios
dc.typeDissertation

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
JulieSamuels2006.pdf
Size:
1.65 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.69 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: