Muddying the waters: the failure of water restoration bureaucracies in Kansas

dc.contributor.authorBecerra, Terrie A.
dc.date.accessioned2010-09-07T15:47:06Z
dc.date.available2010-09-07T15:47:06Z
dc.date.graduationmonthDecember
dc.date.issued2010-09-07T15:47:06Z
dc.date.published2010
dc.description.abstractIn the almost 40 years since the passage of the Clean Water Act and 25 years of regulating nonpoint source pollution, and despite countless state and local community projects focused on water quality issues, clean water goals have not been met. To comprehend this failure and understand how water resources are governed and how water quality goals are pursued, I explore how watershed-level governance structures emerged and function in their specific local environment, within the state hierarchy of water governance, and as implementation of state and national policy. To this end, the structure, process, and outcomes of two newly organized and local watershed-level governance structures in Kansas were examined. An actor-oriented political ecology approach informed by environmental governance and watershed management literature was used to guide the study. Attaining water quality goals necessitates recognizing the connections between the political economy of agriculture, the cultural factors acting upon agricultural producers, and the natural, biophysical environment. Thusly, a comparative case study strategy was employed for the overall research design. Documents and interview transcripts were analyzed employing a grounded theory approach for differences and similarities; they were also sorted into topical categories and coded for common themes. The research questions focused on the agency and capacity of local watershed structures to determine the relations regarding water resource use in their watershed. Central questions addressed structure responsiveness to local versus state or national concerns; the underlying interests reflected by community member participation; and the effectiveness of local water-governance in protecting water resources. Governance models that began with holistic, alternative, participatory strategies are evolving into targeted, problem-solution strategies, and what began as watershed management is becoming problem shed management.
dc.description.advisorGerad D. Middendorf
dc.description.degreeDoctor of Philosophy
dc.description.departmentDepartment of Sociology, Anthropology, and Social Work
dc.description.levelDoctoral
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2097/4848
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherKansas State University
dc.rights© the author. This Item is protected by copyright and/or related rights. You are free to use this Item in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you need to obtain permission from the rights-holder(s).
dc.rights.urihttp://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/
dc.subjectwater
dc.subjectWatershed Restoration and Protection Strategy
dc.subjectWatershed management
dc.subjectEnvironmental governance
dc.subjectwater quality
dc.subject.umiAgriculture, General (0473)
dc.subject.umiEnvironmental Sciences (0768)
dc.subject.umiSociology, General (0626)
dc.subject.umiSociology, Social Structure and Development (0700)
dc.titleMuddying the waters: the failure of water restoration bureaucracies in Kansas
dc.typeDissertation

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
TerrieBecerra2010.pdf
Size:
2.36 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.69 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: