Blur detection is unaffected by cognitive load

dc.citation.doi10.1080/13506285.2014.884203en_US
dc.citation.epage547en_US
dc.citation.issue3en_US
dc.citation.jtitleVisual Cognitionen_US
dc.citation.spage522en_US
dc.citation.volume22en_US
dc.contributor.authorLoschky, Lester C.
dc.contributor.authorRinger, Ryan V.
dc.contributor.authorJohnson, Aaron P.
dc.contributor.authorLarson, Adam M.
dc.contributor.authorNeider, Mark
dc.contributor.authorKramer, Arthur F.
dc.contributor.authoreidloschkyen_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-12-03T17:43:09Z
dc.date.available2014-12-03T17:43:09Z
dc.date.issued2014-03-14
dc.date.published2014en_US
dc.description.abstractBlur detection is affected by retinal eccentricity, but is it also affected by attentional resources? Research showing effects of selective attention on acuity and contrast sensitivity suggests that allocating attention should increase blur detection. However, research showing that blur affects selection of saccade targets suggests that blur detection may be pre-attentive. To investigate this question, we carried out experiments in which viewers detected blur in real-world scenes under varying levels of cognitive load manipulated by the N-back task. We used adaptive threshold estimation to measure blur detection thresholds at 0°, 3°, 6°, and 9° eccentricity. Participants carried out blur detection as a single task, a single task with to-be-ignored letters, or an N-back task with four levels of cognitive load (0, 1, 2, or 3-back). In Experiment 1, blur was presented gaze-contingently for occasional single eye fixations while participants viewed scenes in preparation for an easy picture recognition memory task, and the N-back stimuli were presented auditorily. The results for three participants showed a large effect of retinal eccentricity on blur thresholds, significant effects of N-back level on N-back performance, scene recognition memory, and gaze dispersion, but no effect of N-back level on blur thresholds. In Experiment 2, we replicated Experiment 1 but presented the images tachistoscopically for 200 ms (half with, half without blur), to determine whether gaze-contingent blur presentation in Experiment 1 had produced attentional capture by blur onset during a fixation, thus eliminating any effect of cognitive load on blur detection. The results with three new participants replicated those of Experiment 1, indicating that the use of gaze-contingent blur presentation could not explain the lack of effect of cognitive load on blur detection. Thus, apparently blur detection in real-world scene images is unaffected by attentional resources, as manipulated by the cognitive load produced by the N-back task.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2097/18780
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.relation.urihttp://doi.org/10.1080/13506285.2014.884203en_US
dc.rightsThis is an Open Access article. Non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly attributed, cited, and is not altered, transformed, or built upon in any way, is permitted.en_US
dc.rights.urihttp://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/
dc.subjectBlur detectionen_US
dc.subjectAttentionen_US
dc.subjectCognitive loaden_US
dc.subjectRetinal eccentricityen_US
dc.subjectEye movementsen_US
dc.titleBlur detection is unaffected by cognitive loaden_US
dc.typeArticle (publisher version)en_US

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
LoschkyVisCog2014.pdf
Size:
779.36 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.62 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: