Physical mechanisms for delaying condensation freezing on grooved and sintered wicking surfaces

dc.citation.doi10.1063/5.0105412en_US
dc.citation.issn0003-6951en_US
dc.citation.issue7en_US
dc.citation.jtitleApplied Physics Lettersen_US
dc.citation.volume121en_US
dc.contributor.authorStallbaumer-Cyr, Emily M.
dc.contributor.authorDerby, Melanie M.
dc.contributor.authorBetz, Amy R.
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-17T21:06:57Z
dc.date.available2022-08-17T21:06:57Z
dc.date.issued2022-08-15
dc.date.published2022en_US
dc.description.abstractHeat pipes are passive heat transfer devices crucial for systems on spacecraft; however, they can freeze when exposed to extreme cold temperatures. The research on freezing mechanisms on wicked surfaces, such as those found in heat pipes, is limited. Surface characteristics, including surface topography, have been found to impact freezing. This work investigates freezing mechanisms on wicks during condensation freezing. Experiments were conducted in an environmental chamber at 22 °C and 60% relative humidity on three types of surfaces (i.e., plain copper, sintered heat pipe wicks, and grooved heat pipe wicks). The plain copper surface tended to freeze via ice bridging—consistent with other literature—before the grooved and sintered wicks at an average freezing time of 4.6 min with an average droplet diameter of 141.9 ± 58.1 μm at freezing. The grooved surface also froze via ice bridging but required, on average, almost double the length of time the plain copper surface took to freeze, 8.3 min with an average droplet diameter of 60.5 ± 27.9 μm at freezing. Bridges could not form between grooves, so initial freezing for each groove was stochastic. The sintered wick's surface could not propagate solely by ice bridging due to its topography, but also employed stochastic freezing and cascade freezing, which prompted more varied freezing times and an average of 10.9 min with an average droplet diameter of 97.4 ± 32.9 μm at freezing. The topography of the wicked surfaces influenced the location of droplet nucleation and, therefore, the ability for the droplet-to-droplet interaction during the freezing process.en_US
dc.description.awardNo1828571en_US
dc.description.funderNSF Research Traineeship Rural Resiliencyen_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2097/42477
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.1063/5.0105412en_US
dc.rightsThis article may be downloaded for personal use only. Any other use requires prior permission of the author and AIP Publishing. This article appeared in Emily M. Stallbaumer-Cyr, Melanie M. Derby, and Amy R. Betz, "Physical mechanisms for delaying condensation freezing on grooved and sintered wicking surfaces", Appl. Phys. Lett. 121, 071601 (2022) and may be found at https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0105412.en_US
dc.rights.urihttps://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/en_US
dc.rights.urihttps://publishing.aip.org/resources/researchers/rights-and-permissions/sharing-content-online/en_US
dc.titlePhysical mechanisms for delaying condensation freezing on grooved and sintered wicking surfacesen_US
dc.typeTexten_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
APL22_AR_05093__1_.pdf
Size:
3.55 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Stallbaumer-Cyr et al. - 2022 - Physical mechanisms for delaying condensation free.pdf
Size:
2.58 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.62 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: