Comparing the cost-effectiveness of water conservation policies in a depleting aquifer: a dynamic analysis of the Kansas High Plains

dc.citation.epage234en_US
dc.citation.issue2en_US
dc.citation.jtitleJournal of Agricultural and Applied Economicsen_US
dc.citation.spage223en_US
dc.citation.volume44en_US
dc.contributor.authorDing, Ya
dc.contributor.authorPeterson, Jeffrey M.
dc.contributor.authoreidjpetersen_US
dc.date.accessioned2012-10-15T19:01:15Z
dc.date.available2012-10-15T19:01:15Z
dc.date.issued2012-10-15
dc.date.published2012en_US
dc.description.abstractThis research analyzes two groundwater conservation policies in the Kansas High Plains located within the Ogallala aquifer: 1) cost-share assistance to increase irrigation efficiency; and 2) incentive payments to convert irrigated crop production to dryland crop production. To compare the cost-effectiveness of these two policies, a dynamic model simulated a representative irrigator’s optimal technology choice, crop selection, and irrigation water use over time. The results suggest that the overall water-saving effectiveness can be improved when different policy tools are considered under different conditions. High prevailing crop prices greatly reduce irrigators’ incentive to give up irrigation and therefore cause low enrollment and ineffectiveness of the incentive payment program. In areas with low aquifer-saturated thickness, the incentive payment program is more effective, whereas in areas with relatively higher water availability, the cost-share program could be a better choice.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2097/14849
dc.relation.urihttp://purl.umn.edu/123781en_US
dc.rightsPermission to archive granted by the Southern Agricultural Economics Association, October 8, 2012.en_US
dc.subjectCost-share programen_US
dc.subjectIncentive paymentsen_US
dc.subjectOgallala aquiferen_US
dc.subjectDynamic optimizationen_US
dc.subjectGroundwater conservationen_US
dc.titleComparing the cost-effectiveness of water conservation policies in a depleting aquifer: a dynamic analysis of the Kansas High Plainsen_US
dc.typeArticle (publisher version)en_US

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Comparing cost-effectiveness - publisher's PDF.pdf
Size:
498.34 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.62 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: