An evaluation of the impacts of the Sunsweet cooperative’s advertising expenditures

dc.contributor.authorSilva, Jena
dc.date.accessioned2010-12-15T19:06:57Z
dc.date.available2010-12-15T19:06:57Z
dc.date.graduationmonthDecemberen_US
dc.date.issued2010-12-15
dc.date.published2010en_US
dc.description.abstractThe objective of this analysis is to develop a demand model for the Sunsweet Cooperative and from this model, determine if the benefits to Sunweet’s advertising, as measured by the change in revenues, exceed the advertising costs. Weekly retail scanner data from July 20, 2008 through June 13, 2010 were used. Ordinary least squares regression equations were estimated to determine the overall demand for Sunsweet dried prunes. Two different models were estimated, one for Sunsweet’s overall prune demand and another for the Sunsweet’s Ones product. The advertising elasticity for the total dried prune demand was 0.10 and for the Ones product was 0.24. The demand equations demonstrated that Sunsweet’s advertising expenditures are increasing the overall demand for their dried prunes and their specific Ones product. What cannot be determined from the demand estimations is whether increase in revenues was greater than the cost of the advertising program. This is an especially important question for Sunsweet as it can be discerned from the data that Sunsweet’s advertising expenditures are quite large as a fraction of its revenues when compared with other similar food sellers. Using the regression equations, a benefit-cost simulation was conducted. We developed a measure that tells us how much the quantities sold of prunes would be affected by increased advertising expenditures by Sunsweet while taking into account the costs of advertising under an assumption of monopolistic competition. Two different scenarios were evaluated, one with a shutdown condition that did not allow average revenue to be below average cost and another without this shutdown condition. The total Sunsweet prune model resulted in an average benefit cost of 2.143 with the shutdown constraint and 1.845 without the shutdown constraint. The Ones product model resulted in an average benefit-cost estimate of 2.672 with the shutdown constraint and 2.358 without the shutdown constraint. Overall these ratios are good for a company operating under monopolistic competition and suggest that for every dollar spent on the advertising campaign, the average return was near to or greater than $2. Overall our analysis showed that Sunsweet’s advertising expenditures are increasing their overall demand and their benefits of advertising are exceeding their costs of advertising.en_US
dc.description.advisorJohn M. Crespien_US
dc.description.degreeMaster of Scienceen_US
dc.description.departmentDepartment of Agricultural Economicsen_US
dc.description.levelMastersen_US
dc.description.sponsorshipKansas State Universityen_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2097/6989
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherKansas State Universityen
dc.subjectAN EVALUATION OF THE IMPACTS OF THE SUNSWEET COOPERATIVE’S ADVERTISING EXPENDITURESen_US
dc.subjectBenefit Cost Analysisen_US
dc.subject.umiAgriculture, General (0473)en_US
dc.titleAn evaluation of the impacts of the Sunsweet cooperative’s advertising expendituresen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
JenaSilva2010.pdf
Size:
2.16 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.61 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: