Effects of hydrolyzed vegetable protein or hydrolyzed vegetable and meat protein blend on nursery pig performance from 15 to 40 lb
dc.citation.epage | 65 | en_US |
dc.citation.spage | 59 | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Goncalves, Marcio Antonio Dornelles | |
dc.contributor.author | DeRouchey, Joel M. | |
dc.contributor.author | Dritz, Steven S. | |
dc.contributor.author | Tokach, Michael D. | |
dc.contributor.author | Goodband, Robert D. | |
dc.contributor.author | Woodworth, Jason C. | |
dc.contributor.authoreid | jderouch | en_US |
dc.contributor.authoreid | dritz | en_US |
dc.contributor.authoreid | mtokach | en_US |
dc.contributor.authoreid | goodband | en_US |
dc.contributor.authoreid | jwoodworth | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2014-04-21T18:23:40Z | |
dc.date.available | 2014-04-21T18:23:40Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2014-04-21 | |
dc.date.published | 2013 | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | A total of 280 pigs (PIC 327 × 1050, initially 16.7 lb BW) were used in a 28-d trial to evaluate the effects of hydrolyzed vegetable protein or a blend of hydrolyzed vegetable and meat protein for nursery pigs. Three days after weaning, pigs were allotted to 1 of 4 dietary treatments in a completely randomized design, balancing for initial BW and gender. There were 10 pens per treatment with 7 pigs per pen. The 4 treatment diets were: (1) no added specialty protein source (negative control); (2) 6% select menhaden fish meal; (3) 5% hydrolyzed vegetable protein (Hydr SF 52, International Ingredient Corporation, St. Louis, MO), or (4) 6.5% hydrolyzed vegetable and meat protein blend (HDSF Protein; International Ingredient Corporation). Diets were fed in 2 phases, with Phase 1 from d 0 to 17 (treatment diets) and Phase 2 from d 17 to 28 (common diet). From d 0 to 17, pigs fed the negative control diet had improved (P ≤ 0.05) F/G compared with pigs fed diets with Hydr SF 52 or HDSF Protein. No differences in ADG and ADFI were detected among treatments. From d 17 to 28 (common period), no difference was observed in growth performance between pigs previously fed any of the treatment diets. Overall (d 0 to 28), no differences were observed in ADG, ADFI, or F/G among pigs fed any of the treatment diets. Because performance did not differ from pigs fed the negative control diet, definitive conclusions regarding these specialty protein sources cannot be made. | en_US |
dc.description.conference | Swine Day, Manhattan, KS, November 21, 2013 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/2097/17346 | |
dc.language.iso | en_US | en_US |
dc.publisher | Kansas State University. Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service | en_US |
dc.relation.isPartOf | Swine day, 2013 | en_US |
dc.relation.isPartOf | Kansas Agricultural Experiment Station contribution; no. 14-044-S | en_US |
dc.relation.isPartOf | Report of progress (Kansas State University. Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service); 1092 | en_US |
dc.subject | Hydrolyzed vegetable protein | en_US |
dc.subject | Meat protein | en_US |
dc.subject | Protein sources | en_US |
dc.subject | Nursery pig | en_US |
dc.title | Effects of hydrolyzed vegetable protein or hydrolyzed vegetable and meat protein blend on nursery pig performance from 15 to 40 lb | en_US |
dc.type | Conference paper | en_US |