The wrong equations: a reply to Gildenhuys

dc.citation.doi	doi:10.1007/s10539-013-9362-6	en_US
dc.citation.epage	681	en_US
dc.citation.issue	4	en_US
dc.citation.jtitle	Biology & Philosophy	en_US
dc.citation.spage	675	en_US
dc.citation.volume	28	en_US
dc.contributor.author	Glymour, Bruce D.
dc.contributor.authoreid	glymour	en_US
dc.date.accessioned	2013-08-22T13:06:05Z
dc.date.available	2013-08-22T13:06:05Z
dc.date.issued	2013-08-22
dc.date.published	2013	en_US
dc.description.abstract	Glymour (2006) claims that classical population genetic models can reliably predict short and medium run population dynamics only given information about future fitnesses those models cannot themselves predict, and that in consequence the causal, ecological models which can predict future fitnesses afford a more foundational description of natural selection than do population genetic models. This paper defends the first claim from objections offered by Gildenhuys (2011).	en_US
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/2097/16320
dc.language.iso	en_US	en_US
dc.relation.uri	http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10539-013-9362-6	en_US
dc.rights	The final publication is available at http://link.springer.com	en_US
dc.subject	Cause	en_US
dc.subject	Fitness	en_US
dc.subject	Modeling	en_US
dc.subject	Natural selection	en_US
dc.subject	Population genetics	en_US
dc.title	The wrong equations: a reply to Gildenhuys	en_US
dc.type	Article (author version)	en_US

Files

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1