| dc.citation.epage | 27 | en_US |
| dc.citation.spage | 26 | en_US |
| dc.contributor.author | King, M. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Kiracofe, G.H. | |
| dc.contributor.author | McKee, R.M. | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2011-02-08T15:11:43Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2011-02-08T15:11:43Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2011-02-08 | |
| dc.date.published | 1981 | en_US |
| dc.description.abstract | With heifers given two injections of Lutalyse 11 days apart, and inseminated 80 hours after the second injection, only 20% in heat before 48 hours conceived compared with 65% that were in heat 48 to 80 hours after injection. Those showing heat early may have been inseminated too late. Heifers receiving their second injection on day 7. 8, or 9 of the cycle came into heat earlier than those injected on days 10 through 15. | en_US |
| dc.description.conference | Cattlemen's Day, 1981, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS, March 6, 1981 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/2097/7145 | |
| dc.publisher | Kansas State University. Agricultural Experiment Station | en_US |
| dc.relation.isPartOf | Cattlemen’s Day, 1981 | en_US |
| dc.relation.isPartOf | Report of progress (Kansas State University. Agricultural Experiment Station); 394 | en_US |
| dc.subject | Beef | en_US |
| dc.subject | Lutalyse | en_US |
| dc.subject | Synchronization | en_US |
| dc.subject | Insemination | en_US |
| dc.title | Factors affecting conception after synchronization with Lutalyse® and timed insemination | en_US |
| dc.type | Conference paper | en_US |
English
العربية
বাংলা
Català
Čeština
Deutsch
Ελληνικά
Español
فارسی
Suomi
Français
Gàidhlig
ગુજરાતી
हिंदी
Magyar
Italiano
Қазақ
Latviešu
मराठी
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Português do Brasil
Русский
Srpski (lat)
Српски
Svenska
தமிழ்
Türkçe
Yкраї́нська
Tiếng Việt
繁体中文