Factors affecting conception after synchronization with Lutalyse® and timed insemination
| dc.citation.epage | 27 | en_US |
| dc.citation.spage | 26 | en_US |
| dc.contributor.author | King, M. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Kiracofe, G.H. | |
| dc.contributor.author | McKee, R.M. | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2011-02-08T15:11:43Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2011-02-08T15:11:43Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2011-02-08 | |
| dc.date.published | 1981 | en_US |
| dc.description.abstract | With heifers given two injections of Lutalyse 11 days apart, and inseminated 80 hours after the second injection, only 20% in heat before 48 hours conceived compared with 65% that were in heat 48 to 80 hours after injection. Those showing heat early may have been inseminated too late. Heifers receiving their second injection on day 7. 8, or 9 of the cycle came into heat earlier than those injected on days 10 through 15. | en_US |
| dc.description.conference | Cattlemen's Day, 1981, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS, March 6, 1981 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/2097/7145 | |
| dc.publisher | Kansas State University. Agricultural Experiment Station | en_US |
| dc.relation.isPartOf | Cattlemen’s Day, 1981 | en_US |
| dc.relation.isPartOf | Report of progress (Kansas State University. Agricultural Experiment Station); 394 | en_US |
| dc.subject | Beef | en_US |
| dc.subject | Lutalyse | en_US |
| dc.subject | Synchronization | en_US |
| dc.subject | Insemination | en_US |
| dc.title | Factors affecting conception after synchronization with Lutalyse® and timed insemination | en_US |
| dc.type | Conference paper | en_US |
