| dc.citation.epage | 40 | en_US |
| dc.citation.spage | 37 | en_US |
| dc.contributor.author | Kats, L.J. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Laurin, J.L. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Tokach, Michael D. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Nelssen, Jim L. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Goodband, Robert D. | |
| dc.contributor.authoreid | mtokach | en_US |
| dc.contributor.authoreid | jnelssen | en_US |
| dc.contributor.authoreid | goodband | en_US |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2010-02-11T22:38:07Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2010-02-11T22:38:07Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2010-02-11T22:38:07Z | |
| dc.date.published | 1992 | en_US |
| dc.description.abstract | A total of 311 weanling pigs (initially 10.9 lb and 17 d of age) was used to compare fish by-products, spray-dried blood meal and combinations of spray-dried blood meal and fish by-products in the phase II (d 7 to 25) diet. Pigs were allotted by weight to one of five experimental treatments with 8 to 11 pigs/pen and seven replications. Pigs were placed on a common phase I diet (d 0 to 7 postweaning) that contained 7.5%spray-dried porcine plasma, 1.75% spray-dried blood meal, and 20% dried whey. The phase I diet was formulated to contain 1.5% lysine, .9% Ca, and .8% P. Pigs were then randomly assigned to one of five dietary treatments. All phase II diets (d 7 to 25 postweaning) contained 10% dried whey and were formulated to contain 1.25% lysine and .36% methionine. The control diet contained 2.5% spray-dried blood meal (SDBM) and 10% dried whey. Select menhaden fish meal (SMFM) and spray-dried fish hydrolysate (SDFH) replaced SDBM on an equal lysine basis at 5% and 4.8%, respectively, and 2.5% SMFM + 1.25% SDBM and 2.0% SDFH + 1.25% SDBM were used in combinations to form the other four dietary treatments. Average daily gain (ADG), average daily feed intake (ADFI), and feed efficiency (F/G) were improved with the addition of SDBM in the fIrst week (d 7 to 14) of phase II. No differences were observed in ADG and ADFI for the overall phase II period. Pigs fed SDBM had poorer FIG (d 7 to 25) compared to pigs fed either SMFM or SDFH. However, SDBM was the most cost effective protein source in this experiment. | en_US |
| dc.description.conference | Swine Day, Manhattan, KS, November 19, 1992 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/2097/2566 | |
| dc.publisher | Kansas State University. Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service | en_US |
| dc.relation.isPartOf | Swine day, 1992 | en_US |
| dc.relation.isPartOf | Kansas Agricultural Experiment Station contribution; no. 93-142-S | en_US |
| dc.relation.isPartOf | Report of progress (Kansas State University. Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service); 667 | en_US |
| dc.subject | Swine | en_US |
| dc.subject | Starter pig | en_US |
| dc.subject | Fish by-products | en_US |
| dc.subject | Blood Meal | en_US |
| dc.title | Comparison of spray-dried blood meal and fish by-products in the phase II starter pig diet | en_US |
| dc.type | Conference paper | en_US |
English
العربية
বাংলা
Català
Čeština
Deutsch
Ελληνικά
Español
فارسی
Suomi
Français
Gàidhlig
ગુજરાતી
हिंदी
Magyar
Italiano
Қазақ
Latviešu
मराठी
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Português do Brasil
Русский
Srpski (lat)
Српски
Svenska
தமிழ்
Türkçe
Yкраї́нська
Tiếng Việt
繁体中文