Estrus synchronization of replacement beef heifers by using GnRH, prostaglandin F2α (PGF), and progesterone (CIDR): a multi-location study

dc.citation.epage6en_US
dc.citation.spage3en_US
dc.contributor.authorLarson, J.E.
dc.contributor.authorLamb, G.C.
dc.contributor.authorGeary, T.W.
dc.contributor.authorStevenson, Jeffrey S.
dc.contributor.authorJohnson, Sandra K.
dc.contributor.authorDay, M.L.
dc.contributor.authorKesler, D.J.
dc.contributor.authorDeJarnette, J.M.
dc.contributor.authorLandblom, D.G.
dc.contributor.authorWhittier, D.
dc.contributor.authoreidjssen_US
dc.contributor.authoreidsandyjen_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-08-03T17:51:44Z
dc.date.available2010-08-03T17:51:44Z
dc.date.issued2010-08-03T17:51:44Z
dc.date.published2004en_US
dc.description.abstractOur objectives were to determine whether a fixed-timed artificial insemination (TAI) protocol could yield similar fertility rates to a protocol requiring detection of estrus and whether an injection of gonadotropin hormone-releasing hormone (GnRH) at CIDR (vaginal insert containing progesterone) insertion enhances pregnancy rates. Replacement beef heifers (n=2,077) from 12 locations were assigned randomly to each of four estrussynchronization protocols. All heifers received a CIDR for 7 days, and an injection of prostaglandin F2α (PGF) on the day of CIDR removal. For treatment EAI, heifers were observed for estrus for 84 hours after PGF administration and were inseminated 6 to 12 hours after observed estrus. Any heifer not detected in estrus was injected with GnRH, followed by TAI. For treatment GnRH+EAI, heifers were treated as those for EAI, but also received GnRH at the time of CIDR insertion. For treatment TAI, heifers received a single TAI at 60 hours after PGF administration. For treatment GnRH+TAI, heifers were treated as those for TAI, but also received GnRH at CIDR insertion. The percentage of heifers cycling at the initiation of estrus-synchronization was 91%; the percentage of cycling heifers among locations ranged from 78 to 100%. Overall pregnancy rates among locations ranged from 38 to 74%. Pregnancy rates were 57.3, 54.5, 53.1, and 49.1% for GnRH+EAI, EAI, GnRH+TAI, and TAI, respectively. Although no statistically significant differences in pregnancy rates among treatments were observed, the GnRH+EAI treatment achieved the numerically greatest pregnancy rates. In addition, the GnRH+TAI protocol provides an alternative that allows producers to synchronize heifers without detection of estrus.en_US
dc.description.conferenceCattlemen's Day, 2004, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS, March 5, 2004en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2097/4403
dc.publisherKansas State University. Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Serviceen_US
dc.relation.isPartOfCattlemen's Day, 2004en_US
dc.relation.isPartOfKansas Agricultural Experiment Station contribution; no. 04-242-Sen_US
dc.relation.isPartOfReport of progress (Kansas State University. Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service); 923en_US
dc.subjectBeefen_US
dc.subjectEstrus synchronizationen_US
dc.subjectGnRHen_US
dc.subjectProstaglandin F2α (PGF)en_US
dc.subjectProgesterone (CIDR)en_US
dc.titleEstrus synchronization of replacement beef heifers by using GnRH, prostaglandin F2α (PGF), and progesterone (CIDR): a multi-location studyen_US
dc.typeConference paperen_US

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
cattle04pg3-6.pdf
Size:
63.91 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.69 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: