How & why?: Third-person perceptions of people with terminal illnesses’ suicides as a function of suicide method & motive

dc.contributor.authorSchiffer, Ashley
dc.date.accessioned2025-03-12T14:48:35Z
dc.date.available2025-03-12T14:48:35Z
dc.date.graduationmonthMay
dc.date.issued2025
dc.description.abstractSuicide and terminal illness are two phenomena that are stigmatized independently of one another (e.g., Batterham et al., 2013; Epley & McCaghy, 1978). However, suicide by people with severe physical health states is perceived fairly positively in general (e.g., Schiffer & Saucier, 2024) as well as more acceptable compared to suicides precipitated by other situations (e.g., interpersonal issues; Winterrowd et al., 2015). For further insight on the coexistence of suicide and terminal illness, this research quantitatively assessed how third-person perceptions of people with terminal illnesses’ suicides (e.g., acceptability, stigma) vary as a function of situational factors related to the suicide as well as individual differences among participants related to pride and existential considerations. Vignettes were used in between-groups designs to manipulate situational factors including a target person’s suicide method (Study 1) and primary motive (Study 2). On average, participants reported generally favorable attitudes toward this phenomenon across studies. In Study 1, medical methods (e.g., physician-assisted death) were perceived more favorably than traditional methods (e.g., hanging), but minimal differences in perceptions emerged across various suicide motives (e.g., mental health concerns, wanting control over death) in Study 2. Masculine Honor Beliefs were positively associated with stigmatizing attitudes toward the target. The effects of Free Will Beliefs were often moderated by the conditional manipulations. Self-directed and other-directed Fear of Death yielded contradictory effects. Suicide Acceptability was consistently positively associated with favorable attitudes toward this phenomenon. Overall, this program of research has important implications for understanding nuances in third-person perceptions of this phenomenon as a function of relevant situational factors (e.g., method, motive) and individual differences, while advancing suicide theories to be more comprehensive and inclusive of severe physical health states.
dc.description.advisorDonald A. Saucier
dc.description.degreeDoctor of Philosophy
dc.description.departmentDepartment of Psychological Sciences
dc.description.levelDoctoral
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2097/44802
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.subjectsuicide
dc.subjectterminal illness
dc.subjectmasculine honor beliefs
dc.subjectfree will beliefs
dc.subjectfear of death
dc.subjectsuicide acceptability
dc.titleHow & why?: Third-person perceptions of people with terminal illnesses’ suicides as a function of suicide method & motive
dc.typeDissertation

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
AshleySchiffer2025.pdf
Size:
1.95 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.65 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: