A meta-analysis of supplemental enzyme studies in growing-finishing pigs fed diets containing dried distillers grains with solubles: effects on growth performance

dc.citation.epage224en_US
dc.citation.spage220en_US
dc.contributor.authorJacela, J.Y.
dc.contributor.authorDeRouchey, Joel M.
dc.contributor.authorTokach, Michael D.
dc.contributor.authorGoodband, Robert D.
dc.contributor.authorNelssen, Jim L.
dc.contributor.authorDritz, Steven S.
dc.contributor.authoreiddritzen_US
dc.contributor.authoreiddritzen_US
dc.contributor.authoreidjderouchen_US
dc.contributor.authoreidmtokachen_US
dc.contributor.authoreidgoodbanden_US
dc.contributor.authoreidjnelssenen_US
dc.date.accessioned2009-11-10T14:39:07Z
dc.date.available2009-11-10T14:39:07Z
dc.date.issued2009-11-10T14:39:07Z
dc.date.published2009en_US
dc.description.abstractA meta-analysis of 4 experiments involving 4,506 pigs was conducted to determine the effects of several commercial enzymes on the growth performance of growing-finishing pigs fed various amounts of dried distillers grains with solubles (DDGS). Experiments 1 and 2 used corn-soybean meal-based diets with 15% DDGS. A β-mannanase enzyme (Hemicell; ChemGen Corp., Gaithersburg, MD) was used in enzyme treatments in Exp. 1, and a blend of enzymes that had β-glucanase, cellulase, and protease activities (Agri-king REAP; Agri-King, Inc., Fulton, IL) was used in Exp. 2. In Exp. 3, diets containing 45% and 60% DDGS were fed with or without 2 commercial enzyme products designed for use in diets containing DDGS. In Exp. 4, an enzyme product with bacterial endo-1,4-β-xylanase was evaluated in diets containing 30% DDGS. All enzyme treatments in each experiment were pooled in a meta-analysis to compare the responses to diets with or without enzyme addition regardless of the other factors tested in each trial. All experiments were conducted in the same commercial swine research facility. There were no differences in ADG (P > 0.52), ADFI (P > 0.33), F/G (P > 0.35), and final weight (P > 0.60) among pigs fed diets with added enzyme and pigs fed diets without enzyme in any of the 4 experiments or in the pooled data. In conclusion, on the basis of the combined results from the 4 experiments evaluated in this meta-analysis, adding these enzymes in diets containing various amounts of DDGS does not appear to be beneficial in pigs.en_US
dc.description.conferenceSwine Day, Manhattan, KS, November 19, 2009en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2097/2123
dc.publisherKansas State University. Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Serviceen_US
dc.relation.isPartOfSwine day, 2009en_US
dc.relation.isPartOfKansas Agricultural Experiment Station contribution; no. 10-014-Sen_US
dc.relation.isPartOfReport of progress (Kansas State University. Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service); 1020en_US
dc.subjectDried distillers grains with solublesen_US
dc.subjectEnzymeen_US
dc.subjectSwineen_US
dc.titleA meta-analysis of supplemental enzyme studies in growing-finishing pigs fed diets containing dried distillers grains with solubles: effects on growth performanceen_US
dc.typeConference paperen_US

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
A Meta Analysis of Supplemental Enzyme Studies.pdf
Size:
737.46 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.69 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:

Collections