Ammonia and Methane Emission Factors from Cattle Operations Expressed as Losses of Dietary Nutrients or Energy

dc.citation.doi10.3390/agriculture7030016
dc.citation.issn2077-0472
dc.citation.issue3
dc.citation.jtitleAgriculture 
dc.citation.volume7
dc.contributor.authorLiu, Zifei
dc.contributor.authorLiu, Yang
dc.contributor.authorMurphy, James P.
dc.contributor.authorMaghirang, Ronaldo
dc.contributor.authoreidZifeiliu
dc.contributor.authoreidyliu16
dc.contributor.authoreidjmurphy
dc.contributor.authoreidrmaghir
dc.contributor.kstateLiu, Zifei
dc.contributor.kstateLiu, Yang
dc.contributor.kstateMurphy, James P.
dc.contributor.kstateMaghirang, Ronaldo
dc.date.accessioned2017-05-10T20:48:30Z
dc.date.available2017-05-10T20:48:30Z
dc.date.issued2017-02-23
dc.date.published2017
dc.descriptionCitation: Liu, Z.; Liu, Y.; Murphy, J.P.; Maghirang, R. Ammonia and Methane Emission Factors from Cattle Operations Expressed as Losses of Dietary Nutrients or Energy. Agriculture 2017, 7, 16.
dc.description.abstractThe objective of this study was to conduct a systematic review of published literature on ammonia (NH3) and enteric methane (CH4) emissions from beef and dairy cattle operations to obtain statistically representative emission factors based on dietary intakes of nutrients or energy, and to identify major causes of emission variations. NH3emissions from lagoon or other manure storage facilities were not included in this review. The NH3 and CH4 emission rates, expressed as a percentage losses of dietary nutrients or energy, demonstrated much less variation compared with emission rates expressed in g/animal/day. Air temperature and dietary crude protein (CP) content were identified as two major factors that can affect NH3 emission rates in addition to farm type. Feed digestibility and energy intake were identified as two major factors that can affect CH4 emission rates expressed as a percentage losses of dietary energy. Generally, increasing productivity and feed efficiency represented the greatest opportunity for mitigating NH3 or CH4 emissions per unit of livestock product. Expressing CH4loss on a digestible energy basis rather than a gross energy intake basis can better represent the large variation among diets and the effects of varying dietary emission mitigation strategies.
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2097/35577
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture7030016
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subjectCrude Protein Content
dc.subjectFeeding Efficiency
dc.subjectNitrogen
dc.subjectForage-to-Concentrate Ratio
dc.subjectDigestibility
dc.subjectDigestible Energy
dc.titleAmmonia and Methane Emission Factors from Cattle Operations Expressed as Losses of Dietary Nutrients or Energy
dc.typeArticle

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
agriculture-07-00016.pdf
Size:
2.67 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format