There is no evidentiary silver bullet for the frequency adaptation hypothesis

Brase, Gary L.

There is no evidentiary silver bullet for the frequency adaptation hypothesis

dc.citation.doi	10.1017/S0140525X02250098
dc.citation.epage	509	en
dc.citation.issue	4	en
dc.citation.jtitle	Behavioral and brain sciences	en
dc.citation.spage	508	en
dc.citation.volume	25	en
dc.contributor.author	Brase, Gary L.
dc.contributor.authoreid	gbrase	en
dc.date.accessioned	2009-03-12T15:21:47Z
dc.date.available	2009-03-12T15:21:47Z
dc.date.issued	2003-08-11
dc.date.published	2002	en
dc.description	Commentary reacting to article, Adaptationism–how to carry out an exaptationist program by Paul W. Andrews, Steven W. Gangestad and Dan Matthews. Link to the original article is included.	en
dc.description.abstract	Special design criteria are largely unable to discriminate between claims that specific competencies in judgements under uncertainty are a result of an adaptation for representing naturally sampled frequencies, or due only to inherent properties of such a format. Because divisions between these perspectives are thin, evidence via additional criteria are persuasive only in combination, using inference to the best available explanation.	en
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/2097/1295
dc.relation.uri	https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X02250098	en
dc.rights	This Item is protected by copyright and/or related rights. You are free to use this Item in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you need to obtain permission from the rights-holder(s).
dc.rights.uri	http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/
dc.subject	Probability	en
dc.subject	Uncertainty	en
dc.subject	Instruction	en
dc.subject	Cognition	en
dc.subject	Judgment	en
dc.subject	Formats	en
dc.title	There is no evidentiary silver bullet for the frequency adaptation hypothesis	en
dc.type	Article (author version)	en