Using GENI for experimental evaluation of Software Defined Networking in smart grids

dc.citation.doidoi:10.1016/j.bjp.2013.12.021en_US
dc.citation.epage16en_US
dc.citation.jtitleComputer Networksen_US
dc.citation.spage5en_US
dc.citation.volume63en_US
dc.contributor.authorSydney, Ali
dc.contributor.authorOchs, David S.
dc.contributor.authorScoglio, Caterina M.
dc.contributor.authorGruenbacher, Don M.
dc.contributor.authorMiller, Ruth D.
dc.contributor.authoreidcaterinaen_US
dc.contributor.authoreidgrueen_US
dc.contributor.authoreidrdmilleren_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-07-22T14:25:05Z
dc.date.available2014-07-22T14:25:05Z
dc.date.issued2014-07-22
dc.date.published2014en_US
dc.description.abstractThe North American Electric Reliability Corporation (NERC) envisions a smart grid that aggressively explores advance communication network solutions to facilitate real-time monitoring and dynamic control of the bulk electric power system. At the distribution level, the smart grid integrates renewable generation and energy storage mechanisms to improve the reliability of the grid. Furthermore, dynamic pricing and demand management provide customers an avenue to interact with the power system to determine the electricity usage that best satisfies their lifestyle. At the transmission level, efficient communication and a highly automated architecture provide visibility in the power system and as a result, faults are mitigated faster than they can propagate. However, such higher levels of reliability and efficiency rest on the supporting communication infrastructure. To date, utility companies are moving towards Multiprotocol Label Switching (MPLS) because it supports traffic engineering and virtual private networks (VPNs). Furthermore, it provides Quality of Service (QoS) guarantees and fail-over mechanisms in addition to meeting the requirement of non-routability as stipulated by NERC. However, these benefits come at a cost for the infrastructure that supports the fullMPLS specification. With this realization and given a two week implementation and deployment window in GENI, we explore the modularity and flexibility provided by the low cost OpenFlow Software Defined Networking (SDN) solution. In particular, we use OpenFlow to provide 1.) automatic fail-over mechanisms, 2.) a load balancing, and 3.) Quality of Service guarantees: all essential mechanisms for smart grid networks.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2097/18124
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.relation.urihttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1389128613004349en_US
dc.subjectSoftware Defined Networkingen_US
dc.subjectOpenFlowen_US
dc.subjectGENIen_US
dc.subjectTraffic engineeringen_US
dc.subjectQuality of serviceen_US
dc.titleUsing GENI for experimental evaluation of Software Defined Networking in smart gridsen_US
dc.typeArticle (author version)en_US

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
SydneyCompNets2014.pdf
Size:
598.73 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.62 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: