Intermittant antibiotics vs. continuous antibiotics for the finishing pig

dc.citation.epage33en_US
dc.citation.spage31en_US
dc.contributor.authorHines, Robert H.
dc.date.accessioned2010-04-30T17:48:21Z
dc.date.available2010-04-30T17:48:21Z
dc.date.issued2010-04-30T17:48:21Z
dc.date.published1981en_US
dc.description.abstractThe use of low or high level antibiotics fed continuously or intermittantly (2 week rotation) to 310 finishing pigs was evaluated in two trials. No significant improvements were noted for rate of gain or feed per lb. of gain in pigs fed antibiotics either continuously or intermittantly, as compared with pigs fed no antibiotics. No difference in performance was observed in pigs fed antibiotics intermittantly or continuously. The rotation of two high level antibiotics in Trial II did not significantly improve the performance of pigs over that of pigs fed no antibiotics.en_US
dc.description.conferenceSwine Day, Manhattan, KS, November 12, 1981en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2097/3815
dc.publisherKansas State University. Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Serviceen_US
dc.relation.isPartOfSwine day, 1981en_US
dc.relation.isPartOfKansas Agricultural Experiment Station contribution; no. 82-128-Sen_US
dc.relation.isPartOfReport of progress (Kansas State University. Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service); 406en_US
dc.subjectSwineen_US
dc.subjectIntermittant antibioticsen_US
dc.subjectContinuous antibioticsen_US
dc.subjectFinishing pigsen_US
dc.titleIntermittant antibiotics vs. continuous antibiotics for the finishing pigen_US
dc.typeConference paperen_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Swine81pg31-33.pdf
Size:
154.88 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.69 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:

Collections