Active diversity interaction: making choices

dc.citation.epage14en_US
dc.citation.spage1en_US
dc.contributor.authorGrauer, Bette
dc.contributor.authorBitsie-Baldwin, LaVerne
dc.contributor.authorWilcox, Emily
dc.contributor.authoreidgrauerben_US
dc.contributor.authoreidlbaldwinen_US
dc.date.accessioned2013-10-07T15:41:24Z
dc.date.available2013-10-07T15:41:24Z
dc.date.issued2013-10-07
dc.date.published2012en_US
dc.description.abstractThis paper describes a program designed to encourage interaction between minority and majority student groups in engineering. Multicultural engineering advocates at Kansas State University, a predominantly white institution, developed a program designed to increase communication and interaction between multicultural engineering students and the general engineering student population. This program, Making Choices, was presented to Introduction to Engineering classes within different engineering disciplines to encourage students to engage in active diversity interaction. We defined active diversity interaction as seeking out opportunities and choosing to interact with students outside the groups in which they normally networked. During the activity, students interacted and discussed (1) underrepresented populations in engineering, (2) the need for diversity in engineering, (3) interaction opportunities, and (4) the benefits of diversity to all students. The presenters described research that has shown advantages gained from choosing diversity interactions in an academic setting, including physical and psychological health, cognitive growth, improved information transfer, and higher academic achievement. After the discussion, the students created graphs of the number of weekly interactions they had with persons of representative groups in the College of Engineering. For most students the graphs were curved showing that they had large numbers of interactions with just a few groups and small numbers of interactions with other groups. However, in the ideal engineering environment, the line should be nearly flat, showing similar numbers of interactions with all groups. A survey after the activity measured the affective responses of the students to the activity. Results of the survey indicated students tended to agree more with affective responses in the Organization category of Krathwohl’s Affective Domain than with those in the Valuing category. We concluded that many students incorporated diversity interaction into their value systems but were unwilling to self-initiate diversity interactions. We believe this indicates a need for diversity interactions to be included in the engineering curricula in order to provide the benefits that researchers have attributed to interaction between diverse groups, including improved cognitive growth and academic achievement.en_US
dc.description.conferenceAmerican Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition (119th, June 2012, San Antonio, TX)en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2097/16617
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.relation.urihttp://www.asee.org/public/conferences/8/papers/4067/viewen_US
dc.rightsPermission to archive granted by the American Society for Engineering Education, October 4, 2013.en_US
dc.subjectMulticultural engineeringen_US
dc.subjectDiversityen_US
dc.subjectEngineering studentsen_US
dc.subjectKansas State Universityen_US
dc.subjectMulticultural Engineering Programen_US
dc.subjectMaking Choices Programen_US
dc.titleActive diversity interaction: making choicesen_US
dc.typeConference paperen_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
GrauerASEE2012.pdf
Size:
261.73 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.62 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: