Influence of alfalfa harvesting and storing methods on steer performance

dc.citation.epage45en_US
dc.citation.spage40en_US
dc.contributor.authorBolsen, K.K.
dc.contributor.authorBerger, Larry Lyle
dc.contributor.authorRiley, Jack G.
dc.date.accessioned2011-03-08T17:39:38Z
dc.date.available2011-03-08T17:39:38Z
dc.date.issued2011-03-08
dc.date.published1974en_US
dc.description.abstractThree alfalfa treatments were evaluated in a steer performance trial: (1) direct-cut and ensiled with dry milo, (2) field-wilted and ensiled, with milo added at feeding and (3) baled, with milo added at feeding. The rations contained 45.4, 50.9 and 48.1 percent milo, respectively. During the 84-day trial, yearling steers made similar gains on the three rations. Direct-cut and ensiled alfalfa produced the most efficient gain; hay the least efficient. Potential beef gain per acre of alfalfa was lowest from baled hay.en_US
dc.description.conferenceCattlemen's Day, 1974, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS, March 1, 1974en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2097/7984
dc.publisherKansas State University. Agricultural Experiment Stationen_US
dc.relation.isPartOfCattlemen’s Day, 1974en_US
dc.relation.isPartOfReport of progress (Kansas State University. Agricultural Experiment Station); 210en_US
dc.subjectBeefen_US
dc.subjectAlfalfaen_US
dc.subjectSteeren_US
dc.subjectPerformanceen_US
dc.titleInfluence of alfalfa harvesting and storing methods on steer performanceen_US
dc.typeConference paperen_US

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
cattle74pg40-45.pdf
Size:
296.23 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.61 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: