Landscape and Contemporary Art: Overlap, Disregard, and Relevance
dc.citation.epage | 12 | en_US |
dc.citation.spage | 1 | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Kingery-Page, Katie | |
dc.contributor.authoreid | kkp | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2011-05-24T14:50:08Z | |
dc.date.available | 2011-05-24T14:50:08Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2011-05-24 | |
dc.date.published | 2010 | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | Landscape, viewed for centuries by the art world as either an inspirational source for art or as a kind of decorative art, emerged with a new prominence during the twentieth century. Artists and landscape architects now share a realm of overlapping practice. By understanding contemporary art as a body of knowledge and art itself as a ‘mode of knowledge,’ students, educators, and practitioners of landscape architecture can compete more effectively with other ‘form-givers’ in 21st century culture. Art as a mode of knowledge is often disregarded within landscape architecture, in favor of seemingly more analytical approaches to design research dilemmas. Using examples of 20th and 21st century urban art, I argue for art as a mode of knowledge relevant to current landscape architecture practices. I demonstrate the results of applying normative artistic research to a student design project. | en_US |
dc.description.conference | Landscape Legacy: Landscape Architecture and Planning Between Art and Science May 12-14, 2010, Maastricht, the Netherlands | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/2097/9185 | |
dc.subject | Landscape architecture | en_US |
dc.subject | Contemporary art | en_US |
dc.subject | Urban art | en_US |
dc.subject | Hip hop | en_US |
dc.subject | Bronx | en_US |
dc.subject | Detroit | en_US |
dc.subject | New Orleans | en_US |
dc.title | Landscape and Contemporary Art: Overlap, Disregard, and Relevance | en_US |
dc.type | Text | en_US |