Scholarly Communication Task Force Report and Recommendations

dc.contributor.authorAndresen, Daniel
dc.contributor.authorCarroll, Doris
dc.contributor.authorCulbertson, Christopher
dc.contributor.authorGibson, Huston
dc.contributor.authorKastner, Justin
dc.contributor.authorKingery-Page, Katie
dc.contributor.authorLindshield, Brian
dc.contributor.authorMarkham, Mindy
dc.contributor.authorOtto, Ryan
dc.contributor.authorPorath, Suzanne
dc.contributor.authorSuh, Jaebeom
dc.contributor.authorTatonetti, Lisa
dc.contributor.authorYeh, Sheila
dc.date.accessioned2021-08-19T19:29:21Z
dc.date.available2021-08-19T19:29:21Z
dc.date.issued2020-08-24
dc.date.published2020en_US
dc.description.abstractTo address issues resulting from the serials crisis at Kansas State University, Provost Charles Taber, Faculty Senate President Tanya González, and Dean of Libraries Lori Goetsch created the Scholarly Communication Task Force during the 2019 fall semester. The purpose of this task force is to gather stakeholders in the K-State community to review the current landscape of scholarly communication practices on campus and offer recommendations to improve not only access to information at K-State but direct our institutional participation in the movement toward open scholarship. The task force reviewed scholarly communication initiatives at K-State and other higher education institutions and sought input from the campus community. Based on this information, the task force made several recommendations with accompanying budget implications. Recognizing that maintaining the status quo is not fiscally sustainable, we make the following recommendations: • We recommend that the University adopt an Open Access Policy to self-archive articles that it produces • We recommend the Library continue to monitor/manage subscription efficiencies • We recommend greater usage of interlibrary loan as an option for materials not subscribed to by K-State Libraries, while transitioning to transformational agreements and multipayer models • We recommend changes to how research is evaluated based on best practices • We recommend that faculty to write publication costs into their grant proposals • We recommend, continuing the Open Access fee fund, only if it is fully funded and higher priority recommendations are adequately supported Additional information about the task force’s findings and process for gathering information from the campus community are included later in this report.en_US
dc.description.tableOfContentsExecutive Summary Task Force Recommendations Budget Implications Background information Summary of Professional Societies Summary of Scholarly Communication in the United States Summary of Scholarly Communication in Europe and Latin America Summary of Current Scholarly Communication Initiatives at K-State Task Force Process for Gathering Information from Campus Community Glossaryen_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2097/41680
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherKansas State University, Manhattan, KSen_US
dc.rightsThis Item is protected by copyright and/or related rights. You are free to use this Item in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you need to obtain permission from the rights-holder(s).en_US
dc.rights.urihttps://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/en_US
dc.titleScholarly Communication Task Force Report and Recommendationsen_US
dc.typeTexten_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Scholarly Communication Task Force Report Recommendations.pdf
Size:
765.5 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.62 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: