Validation and implementation of a remote three-dimensional accelerometer monitoring system for evaluating behavior patterns in cattle

Abstract

We performed research that investigated the ability of three dimensional accelerometers to classify cattle behavior and also describe the circadian patterns within that behavior. The first of three studies (validation study) tested a decision tree classification system and its ability to describe behaviors of lying, standing, and walking. Classification accuracies for lying, standing, and walking behaviors were 99.2%, 98.0%, and 67.8% respectively, with walking behavior having significantly lower accuracy (P<0.01). This study also tested the accuracy of classifying the above behaviors using different device reporting intervals, or epochs. Reporting intervals of 3, 5, and 10 seconds (s) were evaluated in their ability to describe cattle behaviors of lying, standing, and walking. Classification accuracies for the 3s, 5s, and 10s reporting interval were 98.1%, 97.7%, and 85.4% respectively, with no difference in classification accuracy of the 3s and 5s epochs (P=0.73) while the 10s epoch exhibited significantly lower overall accuracy (P<0.01). This validated accelerometer monitoring system was then implemented in two studies (Winter 2007 and Spring 2008) where the devices were used to describe behavior patterns of beef calves in a drylot production setting. Lying behavior of the cattle was analyzed and found to be significantly associated (P<0.001) with hour of the day. Calves in these studies spent most (> 55%) of the nighttime hours (2000 to 0400) involved in lying behavior and spent the least percentage of time lying (<30%) during periods of time where feed was presented at the bunk (0700 and 1700). Mean lying time was also associated with trial day (P<0.01) and most trial days (67.5%) calves spending between 45% and 55% of time lying. Variation of lying behavior was found between individuals (range 29% to 66%); however, consistency in lying behavior was found within individual calves across study periods. The accelerometer monitoring system studies presented here provide evidence these devices have utility in recording behaviors (lying, standing, and walking) of individual beef calves raised in typical production settings.