Use of Check-all-that-apply (CATA) and penalty analysis for product development guidance: a case study with Mexican-style sources

K-REx Repository

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Gordon, Sheri Lynn
dc.date.accessioned 2019-04-18T16:55:43Z
dc.date.available 2019-04-18T16:55:43Z
dc.date.issued 2019-05-01
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/2097/39603
dc.description.abstract In the industrial setting, one common inclusion in consumer testing is the measurement of consumer reaction to specific product attributes to provide product developers guidance for optimization. Just about right (JAR) scales are a popular choice for obtaining this re-formulation guidance when combined with overall liking to determine the potential impact of responses to overall acceptance. Since 2007, the practice of using Check-all-that-apply (CATA) in various consumer applications has steadily increased. CATA has been used successfully with consumers to understand the sensory characteristics of products. With the increasing popularity of the tool, researchers are studying new ways to analyze CATA data, including applying penalty analysis. However, scant literature exists to compare the outcomes from using JAR scales and CATA for guiding product development. In the present work, two approaches for eliciting hedonic and attribute responses from consumers were compared: one using Just About Right (JAR) scales for rating key attributes and the other Check-All-That-Apply to identify consumer likes and dislikes. Two separate sets of consumers evaluated the same 4 Mexican-style sauce products using one of the two methods in a central location test. Penalty analysis was used to help analyze the data and the interpretation of each data set and the subsequent guidance recommendations for product development were compared. There is a striking agreement between the penalties obtained from each method. Some advantages and disadvantages of both question types are discussed. Thus, intensity-rated CATA questions may have potential use as an alternative to JAR questions for providing formulation optimization guidance within the food manufacturing industry. en_US
dc.description.sponsorship The Campbell Soup Company, Camden, NJ, USA en_US
dc.language.iso en_US en_US
dc.subject Check All that Apply en_US
dc.subject Just About Right en_US
dc.subject Penalty Analysis en_US
dc.subject Product Development en_US
dc.title Use of Check-all-that-apply (CATA) and penalty analysis for product development guidance: a case study with Mexican-style sources en_US
dc.type Thesis en_US
dc.description.degree Master of Science en_US
dc.description.level Masters en_US
dc.description.department Department of Food, Nutrition, Dietetics and Health en_US
dc.description.advisor Edgar Chambers IV en_US
dc.date.published 2019 en_US
dc.date.graduationmonth May en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search K-REx


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account

Statistics








Center for the

Advancement of Digital

Scholarship

cads@k-state.edu