Effects of creep feed pellet diameter on suckling and nursery pig performance

K-REx Repository

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Clark, A. B.
dc.contributor.author De Jong, J. A.
dc.contributor.author DeRouchey, Joel M.
dc.contributor.author Tokach, Michael D.
dc.contributor.author Dritz, Steven S.
dc.contributor.author Goodband, Robert D.
dc.contributor.author Woodworth, Jason C.
dc.date.accessioned 2016-09-20T17:40:39Z
dc.date.available 2016-09-20T17:40:39Z
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/2097/34098
dc.description Citation: Clark, A. B., De Jong, J. A., DeRouchey, J. M., Tokach, M. D., Dritz, S. S., Goodband, R. D., & Woodworth, J. C. (2016). Effects of creep feed pellet diameter on suckling and nursery pig performance. Journal of Animal Science, 94, 100-101. doi:10.2527/msasas2016-213
dc.description.abstract A total of 26 litters of pigs (PIC 327 × 1050; initially 3.2 kg BW and 10-d of age) were used to evaluate the effects of creep feed pellet diameter on suckling pig and nursery growth performance. On d 10 of suckling, litters were allotted to 1 of 2 dietary treatments by parity and BW in a randomized complete block design with 13 replications per treatment. Starting on d 10 of lactation, pigs were fed common pelleted creep feed processed using either a 3.2 mm (small) or a 12.7 mm (large) die. Chromic oxide was included as a fecal marker and fecal swabs were taken on d 14, 17, and 21 to determine percentage of pigs consuming creep feed. On d 21, pigs were weaned and re-allotted to nursery treatments for 21-d and fed in 2 phases. Phase 1 (d 0 to 7 postweaning) treatment diets were the same diets fed during the suckling period with 50% of the pigs remaining on their previously allotted pellet diameter treatment and the other 50% of pigs were re-allotted to the opposite pellet diameter treatment in the nursery. A common meal form diet was fed from d 7 to 21 postweaning. During the suckling phase (d 10 to 21), litters of pigs fed the large creep pellet had decreased (P < 0.03) pre-weaning mortality (0 vs. 2.54%; SEM = 0.008) and increased (P < 0.05) ADFI from d 17 to 21 (30.8 vs. 17.6 g; SEM = 4.41). There were no significant differences in suckling pig BW gain (3.21 vs. 3.25 kg; SEM = 0.107, for small and large pellet treatments, respectively) or percentage of pigs consuming creep feed (58 vs. 59%; SEM = 0.008, for small and large pellet treatments, respectively). During the nursery phase, pigs fed a large nursery pellet, regardless of creep feed treatment, had increased (P < 0.01) ADFI from d 0 to 7 (138 vs. 153 g; SEM = 3.6). Pigs fed the large creep feed pellet, regardless of nursery pellet diameter, had improved (P < 0.03) ADG (67 vs. 50 g; SEM = 5.0) and G:F (0.452 vs. 0.334; SEM = 0.0349) from d 0 to 7 postweaning, as well as improved G:F overall (0.828 vs. 0.779; SEM = 0.0129). There were no significant differences in ADG or ADFI during the common or overall period. In summary, feeding a large creep feed pellet improved late suckling creep ADFI and nursery G:F, while feeding a large nursery pellet increased ADFI during the first week in the nursery.
dc.relation.uri https://doi.org/10.2527/msasas2016-213
dc.rights Copyright © 2016. American Society of Animal Science.
dc.rights.uri http://www.sherpa.ac.uk/romeo/issn/0021-8812/
dc.subject Creep Feed
dc.subject Nursery Pigs
dc.subject Pellets
dc.subject Agriculture
dc.title Effects of creep feed pellet diameter on suckling and nursery pig performance
dc.type Article
dc.date.published 2016
dc.citation.doi 10.2527/msasas2016-213
dc.citation.epage 101
dc.citation.issn 0021-8812
dc.citation.jtitle Journal of Animal Science
dc.citation.spage 100
dc.citation.volume 94
dc.description.embargo 2017-04
dc.contributor.authoreid jderouch
dc.contributor.authoreid mtokach
dc.contributor.authoreid dritz
dc.contributor.authoreid goodband
dc.contributor.authoreid jwoodworth

Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search K-REx

Advanced Search


My Account


Center for the

Advancement of Digital