The benefits of the task for the delivery of negative feedback

K-REx Repository

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Comer, Cheryl L.
dc.date.accessioned 2007-05-02T14:28:50Z
dc.date.available 2007-05-02T14:28:50Z
dc.date.issued 2007-05-02T14:28:50Z
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/2097/296
dc.description.abstract Over 50 years of research has supported the positive relationship between feedback and performance improvement. A recent meta-analysis suggests that feedback may not be beneficial for performance, and that it may actually be harmful for performance (Kluger & DeNisi, 1996). This study suggests that these inconsistencies exist because positive and negative feedback are treated like opposite sides of the same scale. In reality, positive and negative feedback are two very different types of information and should be treated differently. Current research examines feedback delivered interpersonally. When delivering feedback this way, positive feedback is often accepted while negative feedback is rejected. The current study states that alternate delivery methods may be better for the acceptance and use of negative feedback. It is suggested that negative feedback received directly from the task itself may be more accepted, more intrinsically motivating, and result in less negative emotion for receivers than negative feedback from interpersonal sources. Two hundred and two university students participated in a simple computer simulation task. They received feedback regarding their performance and then participated in the task a second time. Results revealed no differences between conditions in acceptance, possibly a result of task. When receiving negative feedback from the task, participants experienced greater intrinsic motivation than when receiving negative feedback from interpersonal sources. Finally, negative feedback from the task resulted in less negative emotion than negative feedback from interpersonal sources. By removing the interpersonal interaction, the task removes a great deal of negative emotion associated with the supervisor. This study revealed great potential for the task as a source of negative feedback. Although the workforce may not be ready for a full task-feedback system, it may serve as a good supplement for interpersonal feedback and worthy of future research in the field setting. en
dc.language.iso en_US en
dc.publisher Kansas State University en
dc.subject Negative feedback en
dc.subject Feedback en
dc.subject Delivery en
dc.subject Task en
dc.subject Interpersonal en
dc.subject Computer simulation en
dc.subject Microworld en
dc.title The benefits of the task for the delivery of negative feedback en
dc.type Dissertation en
dc.description.degree Doctor of Philosophy en
dc.description.level Doctoral en
dc.description.department Department of Psychology en
dc.description.advisor Patrick A. Knight en
dc.subject.umi Psychology, General (0621) en
dc.subject.umi Psychology, Industrial (0624) en
dc.date.published 2007 en
dc.date.graduationmonth May en


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search K-REx


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account

Statistics








Center for the

Advancement of Digital

Scholarship

118 Hale Library

Manhattan KS 66506


(785) 532-7444

cads@k-state.edu