Economic impact of preweaning vaccinations on health and performance of weaned feeder cattle

dc.citation.epage25en_US
dc.citation.spage23en_US
dc.contributor.authorLynch, J.M.
dc.contributor.authorHoughton, P.L.
dc.contributor.authorCorah, L.R.
dc.contributor.authorStokka, Gerald L.
dc.date.accessioned2010-09-02T20:30:18Z
dc.date.available2010-09-02T20:30:18Z
dc.date.issued2010-09-02T20:30:18Z
dc.date.published1997en_US
dc.description.abstractIn October, 1995, 3,565 head of freshly weaned, British-breed calves were received into a weaning facility in southwest Nebraska. Calves were determined to be preconditioned if they had received both viral an d Pasteurella vaccines prior to weaning (PREWEAN; n = 2,315), and all other calves were considered to have no preconditioning (CRTL; n = 1,250). Cattle were processed within 24 hours of arrival, and booster vaccinations were given when appropriate. Average days on feed at the weaning facility were similar between PREWEAN and CTRL calves (52.4 and 50.3 days, respectively), but average daily gain (2.24 vs 1.87 kb) and cost per lb of gain ($.64 vs $.81) were improved (P<.01) for PREWEAN. Processing ($7.48 vs $9.10/hd) and medicine costs ($1.39 vs $5.27/hd) were lower (P<.01) for PREWEAN calves during the weaning phase. Only 10.6% of the PREWEAN calves were treated for sickness, whereas 34.7% of the CTRL calves were treated a t least once (P<.01). Mortality tended to be lower for PREWEAN calves compared to CTRL calves, although it was low for both groups (.26% v s .48%, respectively). The average total cost per head was similar for PREWEAN and CTRL calves ($73.62 vs $72.79, respectively). Theoretical breakevens reflected lower costs and increased performance in PREWEAN cattle . These results suggest that producers should get a return on their money invested in preconditioning programs that include protection against IBR, BVD, PI3, BRSV, and Pasteurella.en_US
dc.description.conferenceCattlemen's Day, 1997, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS, March 7, 1997en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2097/4796
dc.publisherKansas State University. Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Serviceen_US
dc.relation.isPartOfCattlemen’s Day, 1997en_US
dc.relation.isPartOfKansas Agricultural Experiment Station contribution; no. 97-309-Sen_US
dc.relation.isPartOfReport of progress (Kansas State University. Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service); 783en_US
dc.subjectBeefen_US
dc.subjectFeeder cattleen_US
dc.subjectWeaningen_US
dc.subjectPre-conditioningen_US
dc.subjectEconomicsen_US
dc.titleEconomic impact of preweaning vaccinations on health and performance of weaned feeder cattleen_US
dc.typeConference paperen_US

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
cattle97pg23-25.pdf
Size:
17.76 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.69 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: