Grassland restoration in a changing world: consequences of restoration approaches and variable environments

dc.contributor.authorCarter, Daniel Lanphier
dc.date.accessioned2013-03-19T14:00:33Z
dc.date.available2013-03-19T14:00:33Z
dc.date.graduationmonthMayen_US
dc.date.issued2013-05-01
dc.date.published2013en_US
dc.description.abstractThe feasibility of restoration, which traditionally targets historical conditions, is questionable in the context of global change. To address this, my dissertation investigated (Chapter 2) the patterns of restoration establishment along a chronosequence of restored prairies with respect to nearby remnant prairies, (Chapters 3-4) responses of plant communities in restorations initiated using different methods (levels of species richness and sowing density) to drought, which is projected to increase in frequency, and (Chapters 5-6) the effects of propagule source and variation (mixing among sources) on restoration establishment and the generality of restoration outcomes across variable environments using reciprocal common gardens of multi-species restoration seedings. Chapter 2, published in Restoration Ecology, showed that restoration led to the recovery of desirable characteristics within several years, but restorations utilizing primarily fall-collected seeds likely diminished the representation of early phenology species, so biodiversity may be further enhanced by including early phenology species in seeding mixes. Chapters 3 and 4, published respectively in Ecological Applications and Applied Vegetation Science, examined the establishment of native plant communities after seeding and their responses to experimentally imposed drought. Both high seed mixture richness and high density seeding resulted in greater establishment of native, seeded species compared to low richness and low density treatments, and exotic species were less prevalent in high richness and high density treatments. However, we found little evidence of differential drought resistance, recovery, and resilience among treatments. This result coupled with increases in exotic species following drought suggest that other forms of active management may be needed to produce restored plant communities that are robust to climate change. Chapter 5 (published in Ecosphere) iii and Chapter 6 found that seed source affects individual species establishment, community structure, and productivity. However, there was no consistent advantage for any source, including local sources, across sites or species. This suggests that source effects on single species or effects observed at single locations should not be broadly generalized. Together, this dissertation shows that restoration can recover many characteristics of native prairies and that manipulation of seeding practices (seed mixture richness, seeding density, seed source) influence grassland establishment in terms of productivity, community structure, invasion, and the abundance and survival of individual species.en_US
dc.description.advisorJohn M. Blairen_US
dc.description.degreeDoctor of Philosophyen_US
dc.description.departmentDepartment of Division of Biologyen_US
dc.description.levelDoctoralen_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2097/15357
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherKansas State Universityen
dc.subjectClimate changeen_US
dc.subjectTallgrassen_US
dc.subjectCommon gardenen_US
dc.subjectLocal adaptationen_US
dc.subjectChronosequenceen_US
dc.subject.umiBiology (0306)en_US
dc.subject.umiEcology (0329)en_US
dc.titleGrassland restoration in a changing world: consequences of restoration approaches and variable environmentsen_US
dc.typeDissertationen_US

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
DanielCarter2013.pdf
Size:
2.59 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
dissertation
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.62 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: