Meal-time vs ad libitum feeding of finishing swine (feeder comparisons)

dc.citation.epage80en_US
dc.citation.spage77en_US
dc.contributor.authorVargas Vargas, J.
dc.contributor.authorHines, Robert H.
dc.date.accessioned2010-04-30T17:40:03Z
dc.date.available2010-04-30T17:40:03Z
dc.date.issued2010-04-30T17:40:03Z
dc.date.published1983en_US
dc.description.abstractThree feeding trials using 480 finishing pigs were conducted to evaluate meal time feeding versus ad libitum feeding. Growth rate and feed required per pound of gain were similar for all treatments. Carcass characteristics, except for backfat thickness, were similar for meal and ad libitum-fed pigs. Pigs fed ad libitum did have significantly more backfat (1.23 vs 1.01 inches) than the meal-fed pigs. Growth rate and feed efficiency were similar when rectangular feeders were compared with oval feeders for ad libitum feeding of finishing pigs.en_US
dc.description.conferenceSwine Day, Manhattan, KS, November 10, 1983en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2097/3786
dc.publisherKansas State University. Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Serviceen_US
dc.relation.isPartOfSwine day, 1983en_US
dc.relation.isPartOfKansas Agricultural Experiment Station contribution; no. 84-174-Sen_US
dc.relation.isPartOfReport of progress (Kansas State University. Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service); 442en_US
dc.subjectSwineen_US
dc.subjectMeal-time vs. ad libitumen_US
dc.subjectFinishing swineen_US
dc.titleMeal-time vs ad libitum feeding of finishing swine (feeder comparisons)en_US
dc.typeConference paperen_US

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Swine83pg77-80.pdf
Size:
176.17 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.69 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:

Collections