Feedlot fattening experiments with lambs.

dc.citation.epage43en_US
dc.citation.spage39en_US
dc.contributor.authorBell, T.D.
dc.contributor.authorErhart, A.B.
dc.date.accessioned2012-01-04T22:24:19Z
dc.date.available2012-01-04T22:24:19Z
dc.date.issued2012-01-04
dc.date.published1954en_US
dc.description.abstractThe tests this year compared whole milo with steam-rolled milo, and ground milo when fed with a standard roughage ration of ground sorghum fodder (little grain), plus a protein supplement and supplemental salt and limestone. The roughage comparisons included: (1) all sorghum fodder, (2) sorghum fodder and alfalfa hay, (3) sorghum silage and alfalfa hay, (4) sorghum silage and sorghum fodder, and (5) beet top silage and alfalfa hay. One lot of lambs received the standard ration of fodder, milo grain, and protein in pellets containing all three ingredients. The value of antibiotics was checked in one lot and the value of stilbestrol implants and progesterone-stilbestrol implants was checked in two other lots.en_US
dc.description.conference41st Annual Livestock Feeders’ Day. Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS, May 1, 1954en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2097/13280
dc.publisherKansas Agricultural Experiment Stationen_US
dc.relation.isPartOf1953-1954 Progress Reportsen_US
dc.relation.isPartOfCircular (Kansas Agricultural Experiment Station): 308en_US
dc.subjectSheepen_US
dc.subjectFeedloten_US
dc.subjectStilbestrol implantsen_US
dc.subjectProgesterone-stilbestrol implantsen_US
dc.subjectAntibioticsen_US
dc.titleFeedlot fattening experiments with lambs.en_US
dc.typeConference paperen_US

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Livestock54pg39-43.pdf
Size:
334.04 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.61 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: