Drylot receiving program vs pasture conditioning with Micotil® metaphylaxis for grazing stocker calves

dc.citation.epage67en_US
dc.citation.spage65en_US
dc.contributor.authorPaisley, S.I.
dc.contributor.authorFalkner, Thomas R.
dc.contributor.authorBrazle, F.K.
dc.contributor.authorStokka, Gerald L.
dc.date.accessioned2010-08-23T17:33:33Z
dc.date.available2010-08-23T17:33:33Z
dc.date.issued2010-08-23T17:33:33Z
dc.date.published2000en_US
dc.description.abstractThree stocker cattle field studies were conducted comparing a traditional 4- to 5-week drylot receiving program with injectable antibiotics administered on a pull-and-treat basis versus a pasture-based conditioning program using an initial metaphylaxis with Micotil® followed by immediately placing cattle on grass. Although daily gains were similar (P=.80) for both receiving programs during the first 28 days, pasture conditioning reduced the number of cattle treated and increased (P<.01) daily gains during the subsequent grazing phase.en_US
dc.description.conferenceCattlemen's Day, 2000, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS, March 3, 2000en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2097/4669
dc.publisherKansas State University. Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Serviceen_US
dc.relation.isPartOfCattlemen’s Day, 2000en_US
dc.relation.isPartOfKansas Agricultural Experiment Station contribution; no. 00-287-Sen_US
dc.relation.isPartOfReport of progress (Kansas State University. Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service); 850en_US
dc.subjectBeefen_US
dc.subjectStockersen_US
dc.subjectReceivingen_US
dc.subjectMetaphylaxisen_US
dc.subjectMicotil®en_US
dc.titleDrylot receiving program vs pasture conditioning with Micotil® metaphylaxis for grazing stocker calvesen_US
dc.typeConference paperen_US

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
cattle00pg65-67.pdf
Size:
24.07 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.69 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: