Changing public threats and police priorities: How police chiefs respond to emerging threats

dc.contributor.authorIbbetson, Paul A.
dc.date.accessioned2011-11-22T20:23:59Z
dc.date.available2011-11-22T20:23:59Z
dc.date.graduationmonthDecemberen_US
dc.date.issued2011-11-22
dc.date.published2011en_US
dc.description.abstractKansas police chiefs are a unique group of individuals. Because are they located throughout the various sized communities within the state, they have the potential to affect the daily lives of more people on a day-today basis than any other branch of law enforcement. The purpose of this study was to analyze how police chiefs prioritize emerging threats. In this study, using a purposeful sample, 40 semi-structured interviews were conducted with Kansas police chiefs across the state. These police chiefs were asked about their views on the biggest emerging threats they have observed within the last 10 years. They were also asked why certain threats become priorities and why others do not. Police chiefs were split on their thoughts of whether or not they believed resources should be allocated in their communities to defend against terrorism in Kansas. What was discovered during the research process went beyond learning about the process of change for threat prioritization, or what specific threats Kansas police chiefs think their communities are facing today. What was discovered was a deeper understanding of how police chiefs think when it comes to the relationship between police departments, police personnel, and community. As police chiefs addressed the processes by which they go about prioritizing emerging threats, they illuminated a unique strategy hierarchy for success that is centered on maintaining positive departmental perception. To maintain this perception, police chiefs work both officially and covertly within governmental structures and the public sphere to control how people think about their personnel and department. A prominent difference was seen in the physical proximity and accessibility of police chiefs to the community between small, medium, and large towns. In effect, to come to an understanding of the process of prioritization for emerging threats for Kansas police chiefs, it was necessary to understand these police administrators’ unique thought processes that they bring to the table when addressing important issues.en_US
dc.description.advisorRobert K. Schaefferen_US
dc.description.degreeDoctor of Philosophyen_US
dc.description.departmentDepartment of Sociology, Anthropology, and Social Worken_US
dc.description.levelDoctoralen_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2097/13104
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherKansas State Universityen
dc.subjectPolice chiefsen_US
dc.subjectKansas police chiefsen_US
dc.subjectEmerging threatsen_US
dc.subjectPrioritizing threatsen_US
dc.subjectPerceptionen_US
dc.subjectTerrorismen_US
dc.subject.umiCriminology (0627)en_US
dc.subject.umiSocial Research (0344)en_US
dc.subject.umiSociology (0626)en_US
dc.titleChanging public threats and police priorities: How police chiefs respond to emerging threatsen_US
dc.typeDissertationen_US

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
PaulIbbetson2011.pdf
Size:
1.5 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Paul Ibbetson dissertation
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.61 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: