A comparison of different particle size analysis techniques

dc.citation.epage141en_US
dc.citation.spage138en_US
dc.contributor.authorBaldridge, A.L.
dc.contributor.authorStainbrook, T.L.
dc.contributor.authorWoodworth, J.C.
dc.contributor.authorTokach, Michael D.
dc.contributor.authorNelssen, Jim L.
dc.contributor.authorGoodband, Robert D.
dc.contributor.authoreidmtokachen_US
dc.contributor.authoreidjnelssenen_US
dc.contributor.authoreidgoodbanden_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-02-18T20:18:15Z
dc.date.available2010-02-18T20:18:15Z
dc.date.issued2010-02-18T20:18:15Z
dc.date.published2001en_US
dc.description.abstractIn this study, we compared different methods of testing particle size of ground corn. Forty-four corn samples were analyzed for particle size with a Ro-Tap tester equipped with a 13-sieve stack (53 to 3,350 :m tyler mesh screens). Mean particle size of the 44 samples ranged from 422 to 1,143 :m. These samples were then analyzed by placing 280 g on a #14 sieve (1,400 :m). The sieve was shaken by hand as the manufacturer recommended (one-sieve method). In a second procedure, samples were analyzed by placing 50 g of corn on a stack of three sieves: US #12 (1700 :m), #30 (600 :m), and #50 (300 :m: three-sieve method) with balls and carnucles. The three-sieve method was much more reliable in predicting average particle size of ground corn than the one-sieve method when compared to the 13- stack standard operating procedure. In summary, the three-sieve procedure may be a more accurate method to quickly determine particle size than the one-sieve method.en_US
dc.description.conferenceSwine Day, Manhattan, KS, November 15, 2001en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2097/2617
dc.publisherKansas State University. Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Serviceen_US
dc.relation.isPartOfSwine day, 2001en_US
dc.relation.isPartOfKansas Agricultural Experiment Station contribution; no. 02-132-Sen_US
dc.relation.isPartOfReport of progress (Kansas State University. Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service); 880en_US
dc.subjectSwineen_US
dc.subjectGround cornen_US
dc.subjectParticle sizeen_US
dc.subjectProceduresen_US
dc.titleA comparison of different particle size analysis techniquesen_US
dc.typeConference paperen_US

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Swine01pg138-141.pdf
Size:
165.3 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.69 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:

Collections