Protein supplements for feedlot rations compared

dc.citation.epage29en_US
dc.citation.spage26en_US
dc.contributor.authorShiawoya, E.L.
dc.contributor.authorHarbers, L.H.
dc.contributor.authorBolsen, K.K.
dc.contributor.authorRiley, Jack G.
dc.contributor.authorDikeman, Michael E.
dc.contributor.authoreidmdikemanen_US
dc.date.accessioned2011-03-04T19:54:46Z
dc.date.available2011-03-04T19:54:46Z
dc.date.issued2011-03-04
dc.date.published1974en_US
dc.description.abstractProtein supplements composed of either soybean meal, a combination of soybean meal and urea, or milo Starea improved gain 5% and feed efficiency 4% over supplements of either urea or wheat Starea (P<.25). Cost of gain favored the nonprotein nitrogen compounds; thus, choice of supplement was related to relative cost of supplements.en_US
dc.description.conferenceCattlemen's Day, 1974, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS, March 1, 1974en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2097/7976
dc.publisherKansas State University. Agricultural Experiment Stationen_US
dc.relation.isPartOfCattlemen’s Day, 1974en_US
dc.relation.isPartOfReport of progress (Kansas State University. Agricultural Experiment Station); 210en_US
dc.subjectBeefen_US
dc.subjectProteinen_US
dc.subjectFeedlot rationsen_US
dc.titleProtein supplements for feedlot rations compareden_US
dc.typeConference paperen_US

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
cattle74pg26-29.pdf
Size:
175.39 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.61 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: