Computer Assisted Learning: Assessment of the Veterinary Virtual Anatomy Education Software IVALA™

dc.citationLittle, W.B.; Artemiou, E.; Conan, A.; Sparks, C. Computer Assisted Learning: Assessment of the Veterinary Virtual Anatomy Education Software IVALA™. Vet. Sci. 2018, 5, 58.
dc.citation.doi10.3390/vetsci5020058
dc.citation.issn2306-7381
dc.citation.issue2
dc.citation.jtitleVeterinary Sciences
dc.citation.spage58
dc.citation.volume5
dc.contributor.authorLittle, William Brady
dc.contributor.authorArtemiou, Elpida
dc.contributor.authorConan, Anne
dc.contributor.authorSparks, Cathryn
dc.date.accessioned2018-12-14T17:10:20Z
dc.date.available2018-12-14T17:10:20Z
dc.date.issued2018-06-19
dc.date.published2018
dc.descriptionCitation: Little, W.B.; Artemiou, E.; Conan, A.; Sparks, C. Computer Assisted Learning: Assessment of the Veterinary Virtual Anatomy Education Software IVALA™. Vet. Sci. 2018, 5, 58.
dc.description.abstractAlthough cadaveric dissection has historically been the cornerstone of anatomical education, it comes at the cost of some emotional, moral, safety, and environmental concerns. Computer assisted learning (CAL) programs are an increasingly common solution to these issues; however, research regarding the efficacy of high fidelity simulation is limited. The traditional first semester veterinary gross anatomy course curriculum at Ross University School of Veterinary Medicine (RUSVM) was supplemented with a web based virtual anatomy program, IVALA™ (www.ivalalearn.com). The purpose of this study was to assess the relationship between supplementary use of the IVALA™ program and student examination scores, and to measure student perception surrounding IVALA™. IVALA™ uses an interactive virtual canine specimen that enables students to identify, move, rotate, magnify, and remove individual anatomic structures while providing a text description of each selected anatomic point. Fifty-six first semester RUSVM students who supplemented their anatomic learning with the IVALA™ program performed significantly higher on examinations compared to students (n = 123) that did not (p = 0.003). Students’ overall perception toward IVALA™ was enjoyable (mean = 3.8 out of a 5-point Likert scale) and beneficial to their knowledge of anatomy (mean = 3.7); however, students did not support replacing cadaveric dissection with CAL (mean = 2.1). CAL can effectively supplement learning outcomes for veterinary anatomy.
dc.description.versionArticle: Version of Record (VOR)
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2097/39404
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci5020058
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subjectBlended Learning
dc.subjectComputer Assisted Learning (Cal)
dc.subjectEducational Methods
dc.subjectGross Anatomy
dc.subjectVeterinary Anatomy Education
dc.subjectVirtual Anatomy
dc.titleComputer Assisted Learning: Assessment of the Veterinary Virtual Anatomy Education Software IVALA™
dc.typeText

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
vetsci-05-00058.pdf
Size:
222.32 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format