The seated inactivity trial (S.I.T.): physical activity and dietary outcomes associated with eight weeks of imposed sedentary behavior

dc.contributor.authorCull, Brooke J.
dc.date.accessioned2014-08-13T13:24:46Z
dc.date.available2014-08-13T13:24:46Z
dc.date.graduationmonthAugusten_US
dc.date.issued2014-08-13en_US
dc.date.published2014en_US
dc.description.abstractBackground: Time spent in sedentary behaviors, independent of physical activity levels, is a risk factor for chronic diseases and all-cause mortality. It is unknown whether physically active adults alter their dietary and/or physical activity behaviors in response to imposed sedentary time. The aim of this study was to determine whether imposing 10 hours of sedentary time per week for 8 weeks would alter physical activity and/or dietary profiles of physically active adults. Methods: Sixteen physically active, healthy young adults were randomized into either the no-intervention control (CON) group (n=8) or the sedentary-intervention (SIT) group (n=8). SIT participants attended monitored sedentary sessions for 10 hours per week (4 days; 2.5 hours) for 8 weeks. Assessments occurred at baseline, and weeks 4 and 8. Dietary information was collected through 3-day food records and physical activity was assessed through 7 days of accelerometry (Actical at the wrist). Results: There were no differences in physical activity profiles in SIT or CON groups when baseline and week-8 average (average weeks) were compared to the week-4 assessment. Differences in step counts comparing the average weeks and week 4 were not significantly different between CON and SIT groups (CON = 615.1 ± 3019.1, SIT= -1158.0 ± 3373.0 steps, p=0.287). There were no differences in sedentary (p=0.366), light (p=0.293), moderate (p=0.656) or vigorous (p=0.701) physical activity when average weeks were compared to one of imposed sedentary behavior. A greater number of SIT (4/8) participants had lower step counts during the imposed sedentary week, when compared to CON (1/8) participants. There was no difference (p>0.05) between CON and SIT groups for total calories consumed at any time-point. Caloric intake decreased significantly in the SIT group compared to the CON group (SIT = -27.9 ± 22.8%, CON = 10.0 ± 37.6%, p=0.028). More SIT (7/8) than CON (3/8) participants decreased caloric intake from baseline to 8 weeks (p>0.05). Conclusion: Physically active young adults did not alter physical activity profiles, but did decrease their caloric intake, in response to 8 weeks of imposed sedentary time. These findings may indicate a compensatory mechanism to imposed sitting in physically active adults.en_US
dc.description.advisorMark D. Hauben_US
dc.description.degreeMaster of Public Healthen_US
dc.description.departmentDepartment of Human Nutritionen_US
dc.description.levelMastersen_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2097/18214
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherKansas State Universityen
dc.rightsThis Item is protected by copyright and/or related rights. You are free to use this Item in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you need to obtain permission from the rights-holder(s).en
dc.rights.urihttp://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/
dc.subjectNutritionen_US
dc.subjectPhysical activityen_US
dc.subjectImposed sedentary behavioren_US
dc.subjectRiley County Research and Extensionen_US
dc.subjectPublic healthen_US
dc.subjectWalk Kansasen_US
dc.subject.umiKinesiology (0575)en_US
dc.subject.umiNutrition (0570)en_US
dc.subject.umiPublic Health (0573)en_US
dc.titleThe seated inactivity trial (S.I.T.): physical activity and dietary outcomes associated with eight weeks of imposed sedentary behavioren_US
dc.typeThesisen_US

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
BrookeCull2014.pdf
Size:
6.83 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.62 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: