Evaluation of commercial enzyme supplementation on growing pig performance

dc.citation.epage116en_US
dc.citation.spage111en_US
dc.contributor.authorJacela, J.Y.
dc.contributor.authorBrown, P.
dc.contributor.authorTokach, Michael D.
dc.contributor.authorDeRouchey, Joel M.
dc.contributor.authorNelssen, Jim L.
dc.contributor.authorGoodband, Robert D.
dc.contributor.authorDritz, Steven S.
dc.contributor.authoreiddritzen_US
dc.contributor.authoreidmtokachen_US
dc.contributor.authoreidjderouchen_US
dc.contributor.authoreidjnelssenen_US
dc.contributor.authoreidgoodbanden_US
dc.date.accessioned2009-10-06T20:27:02Z
dc.date.available2009-10-06T20:27:02Z
dc.date.issued2009-10-06T20:27:02Z
dc.date.published2008en_US
dc.description.abstractA total of 1,129 pigs were used in a 56-d study to evaluate the effect of a commercial enzyme on growth performance and assess its energy replacement value in swine diets. Pigs were blocked on the basis of pen weights and allotted to 1 of 6 dietary treatments fed in 3 phases. Dietary treatments had increasing levels of fat (0, 2.5, and 5.0%) with or without added enzyme (0.05% or 0% Agri-King REAP). Phase 1 was fed from approximately 75 to 110 lb BW, phase 2 was fed from 110 to 160 lb BW, and phase 3 was fed from 160 to 200 lb BW. Diets were based on cornmeal and soybean meal with 15% added dried distillers grains with solubles (DDGS) and balanced to a constant lysine to calorie ratio (2.98, 2.68, and 2.38 g/Mcal ME for phases 1, 2, and 3, respectively) within diet phase. Pen weights and feed intake were obtained every 2 wk from d 0 to 56 to determine ADG, ADFI, and F/G. There were no interactions (P > 0.11) between the addition of enzyme and added fat for ADG, ADFI, or F/G of pigs throughout the duration of the 84-d experiment. There was no difference (P = 0.53) in ADG, ADFI, or F/G between pigs fed diets with and without added enzyme. However, pigs fed diets with increasing added fat levels had improved (linear, P < 0.03) ADG and F/G. In conclusion, the addition of the commercial enzyme did not affect growth performance of pigs in this study, but ADG and F/G improved with the addition of fat in the corn-soybean meal-based diets with 15% DDGS.en_US
dc.description.conferenceSwine Day, 2008, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS, 2008en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2097/1799
dc.publisherKansas State University. Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Serviceen_US
dc.relation.isPartOfSwine day, 2008en_US
dc.relation.isPartOfKansas Agricultural Experiment Station contribution; no. 09-074-Sen_US
dc.relation.isPartOfReport of progress (Kansas State University. Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service); 1001en_US
dc.subjectEnzymeen_US
dc.subjectFaten_US
dc.subjectGrowthen_US
dc.subjectPigen_US
dc.titleEvaluation of commercial enzyme supplementation on growing pig performanceen_US
dc.typeConference paperen_US

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Evaluation of Commercial Enzyme Supplementation on Growing Pig Performance.pdf
Size:
322.84 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.69 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:

Collections